Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05241-02
Original file (05241-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:mh
Docket No: 5241-02
17 September 2002

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

on. 17 September 2002. Your allegations of error and

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application  
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81  
is attached.

l/345 of 13 August 2002, a copy of which

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAW  

PLRIOWWEL  COMMAND

SJtD 

IWTEDRITY  DRIVE

MILLIWDTOW

111 38055-000 0

1160
Ser 
13 Aug 2002

811/345

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 20 May 02

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN 
(c) NAVADMIN 

049/01
336/01

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on 12 October 2001 for three

years to continue active service.
zone 
the petitioner's reenlistment.

"C" SRB entitlement for the  

Reference (b) did not list a
ETSS(OOO0)  rate at the time of

b.

Reference 

(c) released on 21 December 2001 with an

effective date of 01 January 2002 listed a zone "C" SRB
entitlement for the  

ETSS(OOO0)  rate.

C .

The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date
from 12 October 2001 to reflect 01 January 2002 and receive the
zone

"C" SRB entitlement offered in reference (c).

d.

Navy Personnel Command/OPNAV cannot provide information

pertaining to subsequent SRB  
Therefore,
has been released.
counseled concerning reference  
The petitioner's hindsight is not sufficient grounds to change
the reenlistment as no error or injustice was committed.

NAVADMIN's  until after the NAVADMIN
the petitioner could not have been
(c)  prior to the reenlistment.

In view of the above,

2.
remain as is.

recommend the petitioner's record

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use

3.
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
Enclosure 

(1)  is returned.

Reenlistment

Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02

    Original file (06342-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02

    Original file (07306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01599-02

    Original file (01599-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date of 18 December 2001 to reflect 01 January 2002 and receive the zone "B" SRB entitlement offered in reference (c).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04056-02

    Original file (04056-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the extension agreement of 13 December 2001 and allow his OTEIP extension to June 2002 be established.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02

    Original file (03215-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03241-02

    Original file (03241-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, demonstrate the existence of probable material error or the burden is in.justice. SRB entitlement for the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02164-01

    Original file (02164-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 PERS-815 dated 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date of 23 February 2001 to reflect 02 April 2001 and receive the zone B" SRB entitlement in reference (c).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03265-02

    Original file (03265-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:mh Docket No: 9 July 2002 326542 This is in reference to provisions of title 10 of the lJnited States ( ‘ode. section 01‘ your 1552. your application for correction naval record pursuant to the (lorrcction of Naval Bo;ml al~l~lication for Kecords, sitting in executive 011 9 July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the session, considered...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08976-02

    Original file (08976-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In petitioner's request. response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the ‘B" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and 2. received a zone petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002. reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC Reference Location Selective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02379-01

    Original file (02379-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. "A" SRB entitlement for the petitioner reenlisted, available for the SRB entitlement. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. bv the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.