Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05362-02
Original file (05362-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: X362-02
1 October 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

 

  in executive

I October 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting
session, considered your application oil
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
I60 Ser 8 1 
1 
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum  
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

l/320 of 8 August 2002, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  The names and votes of

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAW PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 

INTEDRITY  DRIVE

YILLINQTON TN 3805 5-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

116 0
Ser 
08 Aug 2002

Sll/jlQ

Subj:

Ref:

BCNR PETITION ICO I

SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 21 Apr 02

(a) 
(b) OPNAVINST  

1160.6A

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval to the

a.

The petitioner reenlisted for four years on 04 September

1998 and received a zone 

"C" SRB entitlement.

b.

The petitioner reenlisted on 22 October 2001 for four

years to continue active service and receive a zone "C" SRB
The petitioner's SRB request was
entitlement for NEC 2735.
approved by PERS 
However, DFAS Cleveland denied the SRB entitlement because the
Per reference
petitioner received a zone  
(b), service members reenlisting for SRB may receive only one zone
"A" 

, one zone "B", and one zone

815/811 to receive the zone 

"C" bonus during a career.

"C" SRB entitlement.

"C" SRB entitlement.

The petitioner requests the zone  

"C" SRB entitlement due

to the approval message by PERS 815.

C .

d.

PERS 815 erroneously approved the zone  

"C" SRB

reenlistment, unfortunately that oversight is not sufficient
There is no
grounds to issue the zone 
waivers to the SRB reenlistment restrictions in reference  

"C" SRB entitlement.

(b).

In view of the above,

2.
as is.

recommend the petitioner's record remain

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by

3.
the Board for correction of Naval Records  
(1) is returned.

(BCNR)

Enclosure

only.

Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02

    Original file (06342-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01302-01

    Original file (01302-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment date of 02 July 1999 and effect a reenlistment upon the completion date of MA ā€œAā€ school training and receive the zone ā€œCā€ SRB entitlement in reference (c). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99

    Original file (00280-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06534-98

    Original file (06534-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 1995 the earliest petitioner was eligible to receive the SRB entitlement was 26 Jul...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02284-01

    Original file (02284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY 5750 YlLLlllDTOW ,LRSOWWEL COMMAND IWTEQRITY DRIVE TN 38055-0000 1160 PERS-815 11 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Subj: Ref: PERS-OOZCB BCNR PETITION ICO SNM's DD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02164-01

    Original file (02164-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 PERS-815 dated 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date of 23 February 2001 to reflect 02 April 2001 and receive the zone B" SRB entitlement in reference (c).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00

    Original file (08169-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01

    Original file (02469-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00844-01

    Original file (00844-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 29 May 1992 for four years to The petitioner's EAOS at the time of continue active service. reference (c), from 21 months the petitioner the zone of did not reenlist on 09 September 1993. continues service to six years.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99

    Original file (02246-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, reference (b) was in effect at the time petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date.