DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 4790-01
19 March 2002
_
.“.*r_
_
”
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
1160 Pers 8 11 of 7 December 200
1, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNE
5720 INTEGRITY DRIV
MILLINGTON TN 38055000
L
E
0
IN REPLY REFER T
O
1160
PERS-811
07 DEC 01
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO SA
Ref:
Encl:
(a)
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 06 Aug 01
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
2.
The petitioner was administratively separated on 11 September
1992 and therefore was not entitled to acquire the additional two
weeks of active duty.
In view of the above,
3.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
Enclosure
4.
Board for Correction of Naval
is returned.
RecordA"(BCNR)
only.
(1)
Ass&s&t,
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07167-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08099-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08129-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request be This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06429-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07975-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the (1) 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06615-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of the petitioner's reenlistment on 21 February 1991, - 0430 or STG reference (b) was in effect.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05024-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2001. reference The petitioner graduated from HM "C" school on 18 April At the time the petitioner negotiated and received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07770-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2002. Docu~iientary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all niaterial subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted early on 29 September 2001 for four years at the request of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08536-01
A three-member panel of rhe Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consitleretl your application 011 18 June 2002. I n addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientioi~s consideration of the entire record, h e Board found that the evidence subn~itted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or I n this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the co~nnients contained in ili.justice. This is an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08341-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE BUREAU OF...