Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05178-02
Original file (05178-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 
1 October 2002

5 178-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

1 October 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on  
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum  
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

1 160 Ser 81 

l/323 of 9 August 2002, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel wilt be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

PLRSOWWEL  

COYMAWD

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

NAVY  
mll.LlnQTow  

TN 2805 5-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

09 Aug 2002

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 24 May 02

(a) 
(b) OPNAVINST  

1160.6A

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval to the

a.

The petitioner discharged from the U. S. Marine Corps on
02 February 2001 after four years and two months active service.
The petitioner discharged  

paygrade  was E-5.

b.

The petitioner enlisted in the U. S. Navy on

2002 for four years.
reflect 12 December 1997 and attain a guarantee to the  
Arms (MA) rate.

The petitioner's ADSD was adjusted to

 

13 February

Master-At-

C .

The petitioner requests broken service SRB or an

enlistment bonus for the MA rate that he received on the date of
enlistment.

d.

Reference (b) offer broken service SRB payment to service

members who discharge from active Navy service for  
hours and less than four years.
prior  service members must enlist in  
establishing eligibility for an EB via guaranteed class "A"
school.

more than  24
Additionally, per reference (b),

paygrade  E3 or below if

In view of the above,

2.
remain as is.

recommend the petitioner's record

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use

3.
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.

MMC(SS)  USN
Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05210-02

    Original file (05210-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08203-02

    Original file (08203-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was discharged from the Navy on 08 October 1993 after serving 2 years 08 months and 21 days of active service.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08823-02

    Original file (08823-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of h all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, together applicable statutes, regulat opinion furnished by NPC which is attached. Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitioner at 3 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02

    Original file (07306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03

    Original file (05848-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01302-01

    Original file (01302-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment date of 02 July 1999 and effect a reenlistment upon the completion date of MA ā€œAā€ school training and receive the zone ā€œCā€ SRB entitlement in reference (c). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98

    Original file (04116-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98

    Original file (00332-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01722-02

    Original file (01722-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 8 1 attached. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02927-01

    Original file (02927-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the petitioner is not requesting SRB based on a However, d. Upon re-entry to active service, MEPS stations are tasked to review NAVET service members SRB eligibility for the present enlistment. The petitioner will be eligible to reenlist for a zone "A" "A" window of eligibility on 22 February However, the The member will Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO In view of the above, 2. remain as is. recommend the petitioner's record to This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for 3. the Board for...