Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08203-02
Original file (08203-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 8203-02
10 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81  
which is attached.

l/453 of 13 November 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with.the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

.EPARTMENT OF THE NA. .

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO 

6

1160
Ser 
811/453
13 Nov 2002

Ref:

SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 22 Aug 02

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN 
)  OPNAVINST  
(
c

049/01
1160.6A

r)

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the

1.
petitioner's request.

a.

The petitioner was discharged from the Navy on 08 October
1993 after serving 2 years 08 months and 21 days of active service.
The petitioner's  

rate/paygrade upon discharge was 

MN3.

b.

The petitioner NAVET enlisted on 31 October 2001 after 8 years
Reference (b) listed the MN rate

and 23 days break in active service.
as an SRB eligible rate at the time petitioner re-enlisted active
duty.

The petitioner requests a Broken Service for his NAVET

enlistment of 31 October 2001.

C .

d.

Per reference (c),

members with broken-service must have less

than four years break in service.
receive the SRB entitlement because he has more than four years break
in service.

The petitioner is ineligible to

In view of the above, recommend the petitioner's record remain  as

2.
is.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is
returned.

Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02

    Original file (07306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02927-01

    Original file (02927-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the petitioner is not requesting SRB based on a However, d. Upon re-entry to active service, MEPS stations are tasked to review NAVET service members SRB eligibility for the present enlistment. The petitioner will be eligible to reenlist for a zone "A" "A" window of eligibility on 22 February However, the The member will Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO In view of the above, 2. remain as is. recommend the petitioner's record to This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for 3. the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08823-02

    Original file (08823-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of h all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, together applicable statutes, regulat opinion furnished by NPC which is attached. Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitioner at 3 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05210-02

    Original file (05210-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10796-07

    Original file (10796-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/335 dtd 28 Apr 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08590-02

    Original file (08590-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c), sailor may reenlist anytime within the same fiscal year The petitioner's EAOS is 17 May 2003, which is in the Per In view of the above, recommend the petitioner record remain as 2. is. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08756-01

    Original file (08756-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 02 January 2001 for four "C" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner received 47 months...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01000-05

    Original file (01000-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/079 of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02

    Original file (08063-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05178-02

    Original file (05178-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 5 178-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The petitioner discharged paygrade was E-5. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.