D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY
B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
.I LP: yrj
Docket No: 94-02
18 June 2002
This is i n reference to your application t'or correction of your naval record p~rsuant to tlie
provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, scctiori 1552.
A three-memhel- panel of the 13oarcl for ('orrection of Naval Keco~ds, sitting in executive
session, considered your application o n 18 June 2002. \'our alleg;~tions of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with atlliiinistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Doc~~~nentary 11i;iterial considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with ;dl ~naterial submitted in support tllereol'. your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NRC mernora~ltl~~m 1133 Ser 72160.15 of 5 April 2002, a copy of which is
attached.
In addition, the Roaril considered the advisory
After careful anti conscientious consideration of tlie entire record, tlie Board found that the
evidence subliiittetl was insufficient to establisli the existence of ~>r'obahle ~naterial error or
In this connection, the Board sl~bstantially concurred with the co~nments contained in
illjustice.
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
tlie members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circu~nstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon suhlnission of new and ~naterial
In this regard, it is important
evidence or other matter not previously consitieretl by tlie Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the b~rrden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable tilaterial error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DE:\N PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser 3216035
05 APR 02
From: Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
To :
Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Sub j : BCNR REQUEST ICO
I. -
Ref:
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8F
Encl :
(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 00094-02
1. Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1). Per reference (a)
the applicant enlisted under the PRISE I11 program. The maximum
paygrade for accessions via the PRISE I11 program is E-3, except
for NAVETs guaranteed AECF, CTI (N), or the Nuclear Field (NF).
2. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
Correction of Naval ~ecords o
(1) is returned-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00852-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:yrj Docket No: 852-02 18 June 2002 This is i n reference to your application for correction of your naval record pilrsuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material cunsitleretl by the Board consisted of your application, together with all nlaterial si~b~nitted applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00200-02
A three-member panel of tlie Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. In atltlirion, the Boartl consicleretl the advisory After careful and conscientious consi(leration of the entire record, tlie Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable ~naterial error or injustice. When he reenlisted back on ac:tive duty he was authorized the rank of Lance Corporal.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02966-01
111 addition, tlie Boartl considered tlie advisory opinion furnished by H Q M C ~nemorantlu~il 7200Jh KFLI3 of 7 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. (,: MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: REQUEST FOR BCNR ADVISORY ON^ .. . WJmmmijj We have been requested to provide an advisory opinion regarding a request to authorize SNM to sell back accrued leave.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01084-02
I'etitioner's allegations of error a i d injustice on 23 April 2002 antl, pursuant to its regulations. Hcfore applying to this Board, I'etitioner exlia~lstetl all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within tlie Department of tlie Navy. Upon review and consic-leratio~i of all tlie evidence of record, antl especially in light of tlie contents of e~iclosure (2).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02208-02
mh MEH: Docket No: 2208-02 9 July 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the IJnitetl States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the OI,I for accord;mce with A three-member panel of the Hoard session, considered your application were reviewed in proceedings of this application, together with applicable statutes, opinion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01261-02
S(rl?iecl hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Roml rtqwsting, in effect, that the applicable naval recortl be corrected to show lie recnlist~d and W ~ I S ;ttlvancetl untlcr the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistnlent ( S T A K) program. I h l n n , i'feif'fer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i11.j~rstict: on 1 1 June 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, detern~ined tliat the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04339-02
Documentary ~naterial consitlered by tlie Boartl consisted of tlie enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all tlie evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), tlie Board finds tlie existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. P~lrsllant to Sectioll 6(c) of tlie revised i'rocetlilres of 1111: Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02628-02
E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:yrj Docket No: 2628-02 18 June 2002 From: Chair~nan, Board for Clorrection of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Sul~ject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the al)plicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone " A "...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00286-02
Pursuant to tlie provisions of refcl-elice (a), Sul9ect hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board reqi~esting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the reenlist~iient of 30 October 2001 is in the rate/grade of AE2/E5. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Milner, antl Ms. Hare, reviewetl Petitiolier's allegations of error and injustice on I X June 2002 atid, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00254-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:dclj Docket No: 254-02 28 May 2002 Frotn: To: (Ihairliiari, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL, RECORD (a) Title 10 U.S.C. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and inJ~lstice on 21 May 2002 antl, pilrsuant to its regulations, deterlninetl that tlie corrective action indicated below sho~~lcl...