DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
JLP:yrj
Docket No: 852-02
18 June 2002
This is i n reference to your application for correction of your naval record pilrsuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the I3oarcl for Correction of Naval Kecortls, sitting in executive
session, considered your application o n 18 June 2002. Your allegntions of error and illjustice
were reviewed in accordance with ad niinistrative regulations and ~>rocetlures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material cunsitleretl by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all nlaterial si~b~nitted
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NRC niemorandilm 133 SER 3216058 of 23 April 2002, a copy of which is
attached.
I n addition, the Board consiclered tlie advisory
in support thereof, your naval record and
After careful and conscientious consideration of tlie entire record, the Boartl found that the
evidence subniitted was insufficient to establish tlie existence of probable material error or
i~ijustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
tlie members of tlie panel will be filrnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circun~stances of your case are sucli that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to Iiave the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and niaterial
evidence or other matter not previously considered by tlie Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all ofticial records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or ili.justice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser 3 2 / 6058
23 APR 02
From: Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
To :
Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records
S u b j : BCNR REQUEST ICO
Ref:
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8F
Encl :
(1) ECNR Docket Nr. 00852-02
1. Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1). Per reference (a),
the applicant enlisted under the PRISE I11 program. The maximum
paygrade for accessions via the PRISE I11 program is E-3, except
for NAVETs guaranteed AECF, CTI (N), or the Nuclear Field (NF).
2. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
Correction of Naval Records only. Enclosure (1) is returned
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00094-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 .I LP: yrj Docket No: 94-02 18 June 2002 This is i n reference to your application t'or correction of your naval record p~rsuant to tlie provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, scctiori 1552. A three-memhel- panel of the 13oarcl for ('orrection of Naval Keco~ds, sitting in executive session, considered your application o...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02628-02
E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:yrj Docket No: 2628-02 18 June 2002 From: Chair~nan, Board for Clorrection of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Sul~ject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the al)plicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone " A "...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01261-02
S(rl?iecl hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Roml rtqwsting, in effect, that the applicable naval recortl be corrected to show lie recnlist~d and W ~ I S ;ttlvancetl untlcr the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistnlent ( S T A K) program. I h l n n , i'feif'fer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i11.j~rstict: on 1 1 June 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, detern~ined tliat the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05082-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject llereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board reqwsting, i n effect, that the applicable naval recortl be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E3 based on tlie referral of' four individuals for naval service.. 2. The Board, consisting ot' Messrs. McPartlin, Milner, antl Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i11.justice on 18 June 2002 antl, ~ ~ i ~ r s u a n t determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02319-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 23 19-02 3 April 2002 From : Chairnian, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Pauling, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i11.justice on 26 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that tlie corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02692-01
~ 3 / 19 June 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy S 110; : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject liereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in eflkct, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the reenlistment of 4 December 2000 is in the rate1gr:ide of AME3lE4. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McF'artlin, Milner,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01291-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 M E H : I ~ ~ Docker No: I I 111ne 2 0 0 2 l?O 1-02 (a) Title 10 0.S.C'. 1552 l'i~~-si~ant to the provisions of' refi'~-~nce I . Suhject Iicrciniit'ter rckrretl to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( I ) with this Hoard requesting, i n ef'f'ect, that the applicaI>le naval I-ecortl be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "13" Sclwti\v I
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00529-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. In his petition, Petty Officer was told at the Charlotte MEPS that he was not el He requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB. Every recruit is not offc~ed n"l- r ~ c e i i r e ~ an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08152-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. h4cPitrtlin, M ilner, antl Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and inji~stice on 18 June 2002 and, Ixlrsuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. 111 correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office Ixlving cognizance over the sut!ject matter addressed i n Petitioner's application has com~nentetl to the effect that the request has merit and warrants...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02208-02
mh MEH: Docket No: 2208-02 9 July 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the IJnitetl States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the OI,I for accord;mce with A three-member panel of the Hoard session, considered your application were reviewed in proceedings of this application, together with applicable statutes, opinion...