mh
MEH:
Docket No: 2208-02
9
July 2002
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
Dear
This is in reference to your application
provisions of title
10 of the
IJnitetl States
Code, section
1552.
for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
OI,I
for
accord;mce with
A three-member panel of the Hoard
session, considered your application
were reviewed in
proceedings of this
application, together with
applicable statutes,
opinion furnished by
is attached.
r)O~~~ll~~t~t~~l-y
all
regulatiqms
CNRC
illaterial
and policies.
111e11lora1l(lu111
Roai-(1.
C:orrection of
9
July
N:~val Records, sitting in executive
X02, Your allegations of error and injustice
aclnlinistrative regulations
procedtires applicable to the
malcrial considered by the Board consisted of your
and
s~tl~~nittccl
In
13.3
in
adtli
Ser
I
sup~~orl thereof,
your naval record and
the Board considered the advisory
tion,
32/6137 of 26 June 2002, a copy of which
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the
frlrnishetl
rcqtlest.
panel
will be
11pon
01‘
your case are
It is regretted that the circumstances
You are entitled to have the
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
such that favorable action cannot be taken.
upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
Roard reconsider
its decision
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser
Zc->tiMrnZ
32/L013-7
Commander,
Executive Director ,
Navy Recruiting Comman
d
Board for Correction of Naval Records
BCNR REQUEST ICO
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST
1130.8F
(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 02208-02
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
1.
the applicant enlisted under the PRISE III program.
paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is E-3, except
for
NAVETs guaranteed AECF,
or the Nuclear Field (NF).
Per reference (a)
CT1 (N),
The maximum
This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
2.
Correction of Naval Records only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00327-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application oh 1 October 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6059 of 23 April 2002, a NAVCRUITCOR4 ~llemo~-antlum 1 133 Ser After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01395-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01333-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06127-02
A three-member p session, considered your injustice were reviewed in to the proceedings of this your application, together opinion furnished by NA copy of which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6197 of 4 October 2002, a In addition, the Board considered the advisory n of the entire record, the Board found that the cient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04780-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00744-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOh4 copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03647-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07260-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07972-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.