D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00
MEH: tj
Docket No: 1678-99
7 July 1999
Dear CHIEF PETTY OFFICER- -
.
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 PERS-815 of 10 June 1999, a copy of which
is attached.
After careful and conscien~ious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON T N 38055-0000
IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO
1160
PERS-815
10 Jun 99
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj : BCNR PETITION ICO
USN,
Ref:
(a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 01 Mar 99
(b) NAVOP 045/84
(c) NAVOP 096/86
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of
petitioner's request.
- Petitioner enlisted in the U. S. Naval Reserves for six years
on 03 Sep 1982.
- Petitioner enlisted active duty Navy on 18 Jan 1983 for four
years and concurrently signed a 24 month extension for the 6yo
program.
- Petitioner reenlisted on 18 Oct 1984 for 6 years to continue
active service. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 17 Jan 1987
with SEAOS of 17 Jan 1989.
- Reference (b) carried a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the FTB
rate with an award level of 1.5 at the time petitioner reenlisted.
- Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement
offered in refercr-n ( b ) f-r the ~ ~ - 5 1 .
i . ? + ~ n ? t of 18 O c t 1984.
- Per reference (b), personnel may reenlist up to 60 days prior
to EAOS for SRB entitlement. However, petitioner reenlisted
approximately 26 months prior to his EAOS of 17 Jan 1987.
- Petitioner should have been advised of the early reenlistment
criteria of reference (b) prior to his reenlistment of 18 Oct
1984. Petitioner could have been advised to wait until he was
within 60 days of his EAOS to reenlist and receive a zone "A" SRB.
However, reference (c) released on 04 Sep 1986 did not carry a
zone "A" SRB for the FTB rate at petitioner's original EAOS of 17
Jan 1984.
2. In view of the above, recommend petitioner's record remain as
is.
3. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure
(1) is returned.
Head,
R~~:,listment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03289-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 14 Apr 1999 to effect a reenlistment within the SRB eligible window of reference (c) and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03370-99
Documentary material consider by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support t ereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference b) did not carry a zone "C" SRB entitlement for the AT(0000) ate at the time petitioner reenlisted. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenl stment date of 06 Mar 98 and effect a reenlistment on 01 May 99 nd receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement in reference (c) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, reference (b) was in effect at the time petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07921-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (b) carried a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the RMSS rate at the time petitioner reenlisted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03873-99
Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of session, considered your application on 19 January 2000. - Petitioner requests to cancel the 4 month extension of 17 Ott 96 and the extension signed on 15 Jun 98 to allow him to receive an additional 42 months of zone "B" SRB entitlement. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06534-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 1995 the earliest petitioner was eligible to receive the SRB entitlement was 26 Jul...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06491-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend disapproval of - Petitioner reenlisted on 20 Sep 99 for...