Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03370-99
Original file (03370-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAW ANNEX 

WASHINGTON DC  20370-51 00 

MEH: tj 
Docket No:  3370-99 
17 August  1999 

This is in  reference to  your application for correction of  youk  naval  record  pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

I 

A three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered  your application on  17 August  1999.  Y  ur  allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material consider  by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material  submitted in  support t  ereof, your  naval  record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, th 
opinion furnished by  BUPERS Memorandum  1160 
is attached. 

considered the advisory 
July  1999, a copy of  which 

After careful and conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially c o n c u d  with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has been  denied.  The names and votes of 
the members of  the panel will be furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your case are such that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision uppn  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the E3~ard. In  this regard,  it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to +ll official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval record,  t  e burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE  N N Y  

BUREAU O F  NAVAL P E R S O N N E L  

5720 INTEGRITY D R I V E  

M I L L I N G T O N  T N  38055-0000 

IN REPLY  R E F E R  TO 

1160 
PERS-815 
26 Jul 99 

MEMORANDUM  FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT~ON OF NAVAL RECORDS 
Via: 

PERS-OOZCB 

S u b j :   BCNR PETITION ICO 

Ref: 

(a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 14 May 99 
(b) NAVADMIN 253/98 
(c) NAVADMIN  132/99 

Encl : 

(1) BCNR File 

1.  In response to reference (a), recommen  disapproval of 
petitioner's request. 

-  Petitioner reenlisted on 07 Apr 99 f r six years to accept 

orders to USS JOHN C. STENNIS.  Reference  b) did not carry a 
zone "C" SRB entitlement for the AT(0000)  ate at the time 
petitioner reenlisted.  Petitioner's  EAOS  t the time was 23 Jun 
2000. 

-  Reference  (c), released on 30 Apr 99 with an effective date 

of 1 May  99 carried a zone "C"  SRB entitlement for the AT(0000) 
rate with an award level of 0.5. 

-  Petitioner requests to expunge reenl stment date of 06 Mar 

98 and effect a reenlistment on 01 May 99  nd receive the zone 
"A" SRB entitlement in reference  (c) . 

-  NAVAL PERSONNEL COMMAND/OPNAV cannot provide information 

pertaining to subsequent SRB NAVADMIN's  un il after the NAVADMIN 
has been released.  Therefore the petition r could not have been 
counseled concerning reference  (c) prior t  the reenlistment. 
Petitioner's  hindsight is not sufficient g ounds to expunge the 
07 Apr  99 reenlistment as no error or inju tice was committed. 

2.  In view of the above, recommend petiti ner's  record remain as 
is. 

3.  This is an advisory memorandum to refe ence  (a) for use 
by the Board for Correction of Naval Recor s  (BCNR) only. 
Enclosure  (1) is returned. 

9 

I 

b 

~eenlistmbnt Incentives Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03289-99

    Original file (03289-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 14 Apr 1999 to effect a reenlistment within the SRB eligible window of reference (c) and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99

    Original file (03281-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99

    Original file (03422-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99

    Original file (02246-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, reference (b) was in effect at the time petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 15_32_38 CST 2001

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99

    Original file (00752-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98

    Original file (08446-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08501-98

    Original file (08501-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 Petitioner's - Reference (c), released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date Dee 1998 carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 of 01 at an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01678-99

    Original file (01678-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03

    Original file (05675-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.