D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH: tj
Docket No: 3281-99
17 August 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of you naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 155 a .
session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Y k ur allegations of error and injustice
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ecords, sitting in executive
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,
opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160
is attached.
considered the advisory
July 1999, a copy of which
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire r&ord, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such t at favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision u n submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the
ard. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to
1 official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, 4 t e burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL,
5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO
1160
PERS-815
26 Jul 99
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Ref:
(a) SNM1s DD Form 149 dtd 6 May 99
(b) NAVADMIN 253/98
(c) NAVADMIN 132/99
Encl :
(1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommen
petitioner's request.
i disapproval of
' i:
)r six years and
- Petitioner reenlisted on 26 Apr 99 f
received a zone "A" SRB for the ET(14TO) r
ite/NEC. Reference (b)
,F
carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for t
be ET (l4TO) rate/NEC
with an award level of 4.0 at the time pet4tioner reenlisted.
Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 23 Apr 2p00 with an SEAOS of 23
Apr 2001.
- Reference (c), released on 30 Apr 9 9 with an effective date
of 1 May 99 increased the zone "A" SRB awapd level to 7.0 vice
4.0 for the ET(14TO) rate/NEC
- Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 26 Apr
99 and effect a reenlistment on 01 May 99 and receive the higher
zone "A" SRB entitlement in reference (c).
- BUPERS/OPNAV cannot provide informatlion pertaining to
subsequent SRB NAVADMIN's until after the DAVADMIN has been
released. Therefore the petitioner could not have been counseled
concerning reference (c) prior to the ree listment. Petitioner's
hindsight is not sufficient grounds to ex unge the 26 Apr 99
reenlistment as no error or injustice was
2. In view of the above, recommend petitioner's record remain as
1s.
3. This is an advisory memorandum to ref rence (a) for use
by the Board for Correction of Naval Reco ds (BCNR) only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
~eenlistdent Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03370-99
Documentary material consider by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support t ereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference b) did not carry a zone "C" SRB entitlement for the AT(0000) ate at the time petitioner reenlisted. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenl stment date of 06 Mar 98 and effect a reenlistment on 01 May 99 nd receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement in reference (c) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03289-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 14 Apr 1999 to effect a reenlistment within the SRB eligible window of reference (c) and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, reference (b) was in effect at the time petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08501-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 Petitioner's - Reference (c), released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date Dee 1998 carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 of 01 at an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03533-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner reenlisted on 18 Jun 1998 for 4 years and received the maximum zone "B" SRB...