Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06317-01
Original file (06317-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC

 

20370-5100

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 63 17-01
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

IJnited States Code, section  

10 of the  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 October 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Your allegations of error and injustice

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. Per NAVADMIN  
under GTEP, nor was it guaranteed in your enlistment contract.
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

163/99, automatic advancement to  

paygrade E4 is not a provision

Accordingly, your application

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or

ofticial records. Consequently,

ili_justice.

 

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03527-01

    Original file (03527-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material corsidered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04345-01

    Original file (04345-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Naval Records, sitting in executive consideretl your application on 30 October 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of session, were reviewed in proceedings of thi application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, to keep in mind when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01089-01

    Original file (01089-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01900-01

    Original file (01900-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory I2 October 2001, a copy of 130D2/0 1 II 1296 of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06973-01

    Original file (06973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    30 October 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNP memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04627-01

    Original file (04627-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 1. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04775-01

    Original file (04775-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum a copy of which is attached. Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05208-01

    Original file (05208-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Per under GTEP, nor was it guaranteed in your enlistment contract. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04999-01

    Original file (04999-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum which is attached. #an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01953-01

    Original file (01953-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 1953-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. opinion furnished by of which is attached. Correction of Naval This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Records onlv.