DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 6973-01
30 October 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title
llnited States Code, section
IO of the
1552.
30 October 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on
. Your allegations of error
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNP memorandum 5420 Ser
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N133D/000281 of
.and injustice
IS October 2001, a copy of
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request
.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
N
OF THE NAV
NAVAL OPERATIONS
Y
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200
0
IN REPLY REFER TO
5420
Ser
OC -(’
N133D/
2001
1
5
000231
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
(a) SECNAVINST
7220.8OE
Encl:
Docket Number 06973-01
1 .
Forwarded, recommending disapproval.
2.
On 14 December 2000 Petty Officer
submarine to ACC 105 (limited duty (L
for medical reasons).
designated Sailors who are placed in a LIMDU status are qualified
for submarine duty unless their LIMDU continues for a period of
more than six months and that eligibility for CONSUBPAY will be
Reference (a) states that submarine
transferred from a
ignment restricted
On 14 June 2001 Petty Officer
d after six months.
was still in a LIMDU status and his CONSUBPAY was
On 06 August 2001 he was found fit for full duty and
physically qualified for
referent
officer, and per
Petty Officer
this date.
for the period.of time be
limited duty (14 June 2001) and his being found medically
qualified for return to a submarine assignment
uty by an undersea medical
CONSUBPAY was restarted on
as not entitled to CONSUBPAY
xpiration of six months on
(06 August 2001).
Submarine Pay
Program Manager
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08349-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 8349-00 12 June 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00858-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. San Diego, CA for shore duty with a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of December 2005. lAW Ref(a) to maintain his CONSUBPAY eligibility, he needed to extend/reenlist through February...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08243-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Year Submarine Career Screening Gate Submarine Service Entry Date CONSUBPAY stopped on 8 February 2002. Per reference (a), reached his Petty Officer The Enlisted Master Record his actual total TOSS is 68 months.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05186-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached. reference (,a), entitlement to CONSUBPAY stops at this point for any submarine Sailor who did not have at least 72 months of TOSS upon reaching his 12 YRGT.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07179-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N133D1000270 of 8 October 2002, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. action that would have enabled him to return to sea until he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03731-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. January 1978. member's ADSD, or January 2004 for EAOS is now 13 months past his HYT date. -Ten of the fourteen ast his PRD are months additional obligated service beyond his HYT date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06118-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03815-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Members CONSUBPAY stopped upon transfer for not meeting the requirements of Ref(a).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00734-01
OPSUBPAY is payable to active duty naval service officers and enlisted personnel when assigned to and serving in a submarine when CONSUBPAY eligibility criteria, paragraph 4, ‘are not met (see enclosure (2)). a. OPSUBPAY when attached for duty (ACC 100) to a submarine command staff: OPSUBPAY is payable on a month-to-month basis to individuals qualified in submarines while attached for duty (ACC 100) to submarine command staffs (enclosure (8)) provide&that . To satisfy ride time...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02114-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. 2114-12 25 Sep 12 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...