DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NPVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH: ddj
Docket No: 3527-01
30 May 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
corsidered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. Your microfiche contains a reenlistment contract of 24 October 1997. You reenlisted
for 5 years, making your EAOS 23 October 2002. You did not provide any documentation
showing that this date should be changed to 23 August 2001. Accordingly, your application has
been denied_ The names and votes of the members
of the panel Will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its
de&ion upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error
or injustice.
Sincerely,
W.. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05397-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on the period of unauthorized absence, you were processed for an administrative discharge by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04957-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. You waived the right to respond to the On 6 June 2001 you were separated from the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment and induction/erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board concluded...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02316-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 25 August 1959, you were advised that your request for correction of your record to show that you were unfit for duty was denied, and you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01830-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04344-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. November 1988. reenlistment and were assigned an At that time, you were not recommended for RR-4 reenlistment code. The Board concluded that two consecutive adverse performance evaluations were sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07219-01
.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03967-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. performance evaluation for the period 29 June to 15 September 2000, you were not recommended for promotion or retention in the You received the general discharge on 15 September 2000. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08927-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04456-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07279-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 2 May 2001 at age 26. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or...