Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04627-01
Original file (04627-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4627-01
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the  

IJnited States Code, section  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 October 200 1.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8  
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

1 1 of 26 September 2001, a copy of which

Your allegations of error and injustice

is

!:onscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
After careful and 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an  
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

1430
Ser 811
26 Sep 01

MEMORANDUM

FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via : Assistant  for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

Ref:

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163

Encl:

(1) BCNR file 

#04627-01

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference

1.
(a), enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

Petty Officer

2.
was released from active duty on
17 November 2000, prior to his actual advancement date of
16 December 2000.
10 April 2001,
for his respective examination cycle.
service he can not be advanced to 

after the limiting date of 31 December 2000

He returned to active duty on

Due to this break in

paygrade  E-5.

Fdirection



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03719-01

    Original file (03719-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. A requirement for advancement under the Accelerated As of when she was issued an advancement certificate, 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04327-01

    Original file (04327-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Office relief is recommended in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06744-01

    Original file (06744-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 of 7 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01089-01

    Original file (01089-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03964-01

    Original file (03964-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 3964-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. l~iinel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04747-01

    Original file (04747-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07210-01

    Original file (07210-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02107-01

    Original file (02107-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 7 July 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer was denied the opportunity to compete 3 for advancement in examination cycle 168, September 2000.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-01

    Original file (01187-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01153-01

    Original file (01153-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...