Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04999-01
Original file (04999-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 4999-01
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title IO of the  

LJnited States Code, section  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 October 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory
1 133 Ser  

N32/6490 of 1 

Your allegations of error and injustice

I October 2001, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members   of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENTOFTHENAV
Y
RECRUTING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.

N/WY  

MILLlNGTON,TENNESEE  

380546057

IN REPLY REFER 

To:

1133
Ser 
11 

N32/6490

Ott 01

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy  Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR REQUEST ICO

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  
(b) CNRC 
ltr  1130 Ser  

1130.8F
38/0630  of 

21AugOO

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 04999-01

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
the Submarine Electronics/Computer Field (SECF) is a
and (b),
five year active duty obligation and does not offer accelerated
advancement to E-3 after boot camp and accelerated advancement
to E-4 after Class "A" School.

Per references (a)

Enclosure (1) contains one 12 month extension for the

2.
Year Obligation Program and another
Enlistment Bonus.
extension for the Five-Year Obligation Program is required.

As per reference (a), only the 12 month

 

12 month extension for the

Five-

This is 

3.
Correction of Naval Records only.

#an  advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06207-01

    Original file (06207-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6207-01 27 November 2001 This is in provisions of title reference to your application for- correction of your naval record pursuant to the IO of the Ilnited States Code, section 1552. wert‘ reviewed in accordance wit panel of the three-mrmher A session, considered your iii_justice to the proceedings your application, applicable opinion furnished by copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04237-01

    Original file (04237-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. enclosure (2) and the DD Form 1966 contained in enclosure the applicant was authorized to enlist in paygrade attend members must enlist in eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed Class school.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05089-01

    Original file (05089-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or In this regard, it is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08558-06

    Original file (08558-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser N32/ of 20 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09355-07

    Original file (09355-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure IN I - I1133 Ser N32/ NOV 26 2007 From: Commander, Navy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01

    Original file (07437-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08005-07

    Original file (08005-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Upon further review, as provided in enclosure (1), and review of the member official service record_ was attach to the Selected Reserve Component as an SKSN/E3 and did participate in the February 2007 (Cycle 192) advancement examination and was selected for SK3/E4. Therefore, the member is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06326-01

    Original file (06326-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 6326-01 27 November 2001 in reference to your application This is provisions of title IO of the I liiitecl States for correction of your naval (lode, section 1552. record pursuant to the panel three-menlber the applic*ation A of session, considered your injustice were reviewed in accordance with to the proceedings your application, applicable statutes, regulations by opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08323-01

    Original file (08323-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. N32/6110 of 20 November opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05694-01

    Original file (05694-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LP:dd_j J Dc?cket No: IS November 200 1 5694-01 This is in reference to provisions of‘ title IO your of the apl)lication llnitrtl St;ltcas Code, section 1552. fOr correction ot’ your naval rt’cord pursuant to the three-rnembcr panel ot‘ your application in ;iccorhncc with A consitlerctl reviewed proceedings of this application, applicable statutes, opinion furnished by a copy of which...