Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04345-01
Original file (04345-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 434501
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

IJnited States Code, section  

10 of the  

1552.

  Naval Records, sitting in executive

consideretl your application on 30 October 2001  

A three-member   panel of the Board for Correction of
session, 
were reviewed in  
proceedings of thi  
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by  
copy of which is  

nccordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
< Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your

III addition, the Board considered the advisory

NAVCRIJITCOM memorandum 1 133 Ser  

. Your allegations of error and injustice

Fttached.

N32/6487 of 

11 October 2001, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of  

thz panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
tell have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
You are entitled  
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
to keep in mind  
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or

irl.justice.

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY  RECRUITING COMMAND

hlIWNGlON,TENNESSEE

5722 INTEGRITY DR.
 

38054M)57

IN REPLY REFER 

TO.

1133
Ser 
11 

N32/6487

act., 01

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Commar.der,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR 

F.EQUEST

ICO

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  

1130.8F

Encl:

(1) 

B(lNR  Docket Nr. 04345-01

Per reference (a),

Applicant's TIR

enter:.ng  into active Navy service are assigned a TIR date

Recommencl.  disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
OSVETs  
according to their accession date for the Navy.
date should 
2.
Correction 

oJi  Naval Records only.

1)e  01 January 2000.

This is 

;in  advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

Enclosure (1) is returned.

_

-l

--

 

By 

direc



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04999-01

    Original file (04999-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum which is attached. #an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06637-01

    Original file (06637-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05818-01

    Original file (05818-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05990-01

    Original file (05990-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 5990-01 8 January 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. E-4 guarantee stated in Per reference (a) "A" school is This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04237-01

    Original file (04237-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. enclosure (2) and the DD Form 1966 contained in enclosure the applicant was authorized to enlist in paygrade attend members must enlist in eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed Class school.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07090-01

    Original file (07090-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory your naval record and N32/06515 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06037-01

    Original file (06037-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    13oartl for panel of the (lorrection of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member session, considered your application on 27 November 200 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this tted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, atldi tion, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05175-01

    Original file (05175-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) "A" school is E-4 guarantee stated in This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board of 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07538-01

    Original file (07538-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06754-01

    Original file (06754-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...