Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04844-01
Original file (04844-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4844-01
27 December 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N 130D  
of which is attached.

l/OlU1355 of 26 November 2001, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

OFFICE OF

  THE CHIEF

2000  NAVY 

  OF NAVAL OPERATION

PENTAGO

N

Y

S

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200

0

1N REPLY

 

REFER 

TO

542 0
N13 
26  Nov 

ODl! 

01~1355

2DIDl

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#04844-01  with microfiche service record

1.

The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty

petition.

N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer

2.
for an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

petition

nlisted in the Navy through the
) on 29 December 1994 and volunteered

Petty Office
3.
Delayed Entry Pr
for the Advanced Electronics Field (AEF)  
Technician (ET) School Guarantee.
his classifier told him he would receive an EB or Navy College
Fund (NCF) upon completion of  
an EB contract.
Petty Officer
that would allow payment of an EB.

01 albeit he does not have
requests favorable action

Petty Officer 

-claims

/ Electronics

\\

EB is not an entitlement,

but a recruiting tool used at the
4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
The EB program is budgeted on quotas
enlist in critical skills.
Navy Recruiting Command and the
provided to the Commander,
Enlisted Community Manager, not by the number of "A"-school
accession seats.
Annex
addition, at the time Petty Officer
was no EB authorized for
Petty Officer
record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in
Every recruit is not offered an EB. In

entered the DEP, there
individuals entering into the AEF field.

"does not have an EB contract in his service

"A" to DD Form 4.

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

5 .
herewith as enclosure (1).

Assistant, Enlisted Bonus
Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00593-01

    Original file (00593-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) . In his Id requests favorable action as disenrolled from he Electronics EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the Members who fail to complete basic including failure to graduate from and who do not continue in the skill for which The Navy offers an 4. discretion of recruiters and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06423-01

    Original file (06423-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110026 23 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl : (1) BCNR case file #06423-01 with microfiche service record 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01

    Original file (03955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. D.C. 20350.2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER 542 0 N130Dl/ 6 Aug 01 TO OlU1198 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03955-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. does not have an EB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01705-01

    Original file (01705-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Delayed'Entry Program (DEP) on 21 August 1998 under a Navy Veteran (NAVET), enlisted in the ""states that he has an EB entry in his DD Form 1966 and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Petty Officer paygrade E-3 or below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08500-01

    Original file (08500-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Enlistment Bonus (EB). Fireman, and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07068-01

    Original file (07068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/ 7 May 2002 02UO198 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07068-01 with microfiche service record 1. entered the Delayed Entry Program , volunteered for the Advanced Command (RTC) on 22 September 2000. requests favorable action that'would allow payment of an Petty Officer EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04774-01

    Original file (04774-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 200 1. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04530-00

    Original file (04530-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (AECF/AEF) On 26 January 2000 Seamen In his petition, Seamen - Carlson requests payment of EB Program and He shipped to active EB is paid upon successful completion EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. member has started training in the skill for which they are to receive an EB, and receive an EB. EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05907-01

    Original file (05907-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/01~1407 19 Dee 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05907-01 with microfiche service record 1. Navy Recruiting Command and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04314-01

    Original file (04314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    his classifier could not establish whether Seaman Apprentice had ever received and EB and instructed him to petition the .an Other Service Veteran (OSVET), e Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 26 In his petition, he states that ection of Naval Records (BCNR) for an EB. Seaman Apprentice EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the The EB program is budgeted on quotas Navy Recruiting 4 . does not have an EB Contract in his At no other time may a member petition for an EB.