Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07068-01
Original file (07068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHENAV

Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 7068-01
26 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
which is attached.

1/02UO1298  of 7 May 2002, a copy of

N130D 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has  
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

been denied. The names and votes of

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

,--
:.

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000

IN REPLY  REFER TO

542 0
N130Dl/  
7 May 
2002

02UO198

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#07068-01  with microfiche service record

1. Th
Office

provides comment and recommendation on Petty
petition.

N130  recommends denial of Petty Officer
2.
for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Kicker.

petition

Petty Officer

3.
(IDEP)  on 6 Septe
Electronics Field (AECF) Program Guarantee, and signed an EB
He shipped to Recruit
contract in the amount of $9,000.

entered the Delayed Entry Program
, volunteered for the Advanced

Command (RTC) on 22 September 2000.
requests favorable action that'would allow payment of an

Petty Officer

EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is included in his
contract.

EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the

4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals
to enlist in critical skills.
on quotas provided by the Commander,
the Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of "A" School
An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed
accession seats.
under the preceding rules.
receives an EB or an EB College Kicker.

Every recruit is not offered nor

The EB program is budgeted based

Navy Recruiting Command and

The message in effect the day a member

EB eligible ratings and award levels are announced by OPNAV

5.
(GENADMIN) messages.
enters the DEP in conjunction with the member's ship date,
determines the EB amount a classifier can offer a member.
BUPERS message
Petty Officer
individuals e
between 1 July 2000 and, 29 September 2000 were eligible for an
Based,on  his DEP and ship dates, Petty Officer
EB of $9,000.
is 

entered the DEP) indicated that
helAECF  Program and shipping to RTC

1218252 JUL 00 (message in effect at the time

entitle?  to an EB of $9,000.

.

r-

!

-...

Subj:

t

COMMENT AND

REC
,“,_

ATION IN THE

SE PETTY OFFICER

Petty Officer

has a valid EB Contract in the amount

6.
of $9,000 and is entitled to that payment upon completion of his
training pipeline and qualification in the skill for which he
He is not entitled to an EB College Kicker
was offered the EB.
because it was not offered by his classifier nor included in his
contract upon entrance into the Navy.
necessary.

No further action is

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

7.
herewith as enclosure (1).

 

.

Assistant,
Programs Branch

Enlisted Bonus



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00549-02

    Original file (00549-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the material considered by the Board consisted of your in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory N13D1/02U0377 29 July 2002, a copy of which emorandum 5420 However, the Chief of Naval Operations has College Kicker in your pay account. MEMORANDUM FOR T E EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj ASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04268-02

    Original file (04268-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Seaman 2001. and signed an EB contract in the to Recruit Training Command (RTC) requests.favorable action that Kicker in addition to the EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. Correction of Naval Records, Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02407-02

    Original file (02407-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 1113 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0660 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06671-02

    Original file (06671-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION CASE OF SEAMAN

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07383-02

    Original file (07383-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 54rQl@PLV REFER TO N130D1/02U0589 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : HE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07383-02 with microfiche service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07000-02

    Original file (07000-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2002. that would allow payment of an $8,000 He shipped to Recruit T In his petition, Seaman 2001, and signed contract for a volunteered for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07147-02

    Original file (07147-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Apprentice 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Ki of $3,000. He shipped to Recruit Training Command (RTC) on 1 e entered the Navy through the 29 March 2002, volunteered for the Seaman Apprentice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03

    Original file (00320-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06320-02

    Original file (06320-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N13 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0651 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : IN THE CASE OF Encl: (1) BCNR case file #06320-02 with microfiche service record - 1. Recruit Training Command (RTC) on 17 December 2001. petition, payment of a $3,000 Seaman Bryant requests...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02811-02

    Original file (02811-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is...