Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04530-00
Original file (04530-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 4530-00
03 October 2000

USN

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 03 October 2000.
were reviewedin accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N130Dl/OU0404 10 August 2000, a copy of

Your allegations of error and injustice

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200

  NAV Y
N

0

S

IN REPLY REFER TO
5420

N130Dl/ 
10 Aug 2000

0~0404

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

D RECOMMENDATION
SN,

IN THE CASE OF SEAMEN

'! 

!>

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#04530-00

 with microfiche service record

Following provides comment and recommendation on Seamen

1.
Carlson's

 petition.

N130 recommends deny Seamen

2.
Enlistment Bonus  

(EB) .

petition for an

-

Seamen

entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 16

- Advanced Electronics Field  

3.
June 1998 with the guarantees of Advanced Electronic Computer
Field 
Enlistment Bonus (EB) of $3,000 (Annex A).
duty on 14 June 1999.
reclassified into the Postal Clerk (PC) Program due to academic
failure.
for the PC Program.

(AECF/AEF)
On 26 January 2000 Seamen

In his petition,

Seamen 

-

Carlson  requests payment of EB

 Program and
He shipped to active

EB is paid upon successful completion

EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the

4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
of the initial training pipeline and designation in skill.
Members who fail to complete basic qualifications for the EB,
including failure to graduate from required school(s), and who do
not continue in the skill for which enlisted, have the EB option
nullified.
the reclassification phase of recruit training.
may the prospective recipient elect the EB incentive.
member has started training in the skill for which they are to
receive an EB,
and receive an EB.
AECF/AEF program for  
the PC Program.
EB.

the member cannot reclassify into another skill

The Navy offers an  

acad

was disenrolled from the

was reclassified into

is not entitled to an

EB  to  members during the   DEP  or
At no other time

Once a

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

5.
herewith as enclosure (1).

Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01056-00

    Original file (01056-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y N 0 S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 23 Mar 200 0 0~0212 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04765-00

    Original file (04765-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. N 20350-2000 Y S IN REPLY REFER T O 5420 N130D1/ 10 Aug 2000 OuO405 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RE N , N THE CASE OF SEAMEN : Encl: (1) BCNR File # 04765-00 with Microfiche Service Record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seamen 1 . claims he is entitled to an EB for AME rating and requests favorable action that 25 April In his but a recruiting tool used at...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08723-00

    Original file (08723-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    20350-2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 22 Jun 01 01ul112 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #08723-00 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and.recommendation Petty 1. requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB in the amount of $4,000. enters the DEP determines the amount of EB a member is eligible According to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01

    Original file (03955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. D.C. 20350.2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER 542 0 N130Dl/ 6 Aug 01 TO OlU1198 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03955-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. does not have an EB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04692-01

    Original file (04692-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by of which is attached. EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04972-02

    Original file (04972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07068-01

    Original file (07068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/ 7 May 2002 02UO198 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07068-01 with microfiche service record 1. entered the Delayed Entry Program , volunteered for the Advanced Command (RTC) on 22 September 2000. requests favorable action that'would allow payment of an Petty Officer EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00593-01

    Original file (00593-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) . In his Id requests favorable action as disenrolled from he Electronics EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the Members who fail to complete basic including failure to graduate from and who do not continue in the skill for which The Navy offers an 4. discretion of recruiters and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01705-01

    Original file (01705-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Delayed'Entry Program (DEP) on 21 August 1998 under a Navy Veteran (NAVET), enlisted in the ""states that he has an EB entry in his DD Form 1966 and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Petty Officer paygrade E-3 or below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05083-01

    Original file (05083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. 20350~2000 N OF THE NAV Y S REPLY REFER TO IN 5420 N130Dl/OlU1252 12 Sep 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS CASE FIREMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05083-01 with microfiche service record The...