Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06423-01
Original file (06423-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

JLP:ddj 
Docket  No:  6423-01 
26  March  2002 

This is  in  reference to  your  application  for correction of  your  naval  record  pursuant  to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the  United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A three-member panel  of  the  Board  for Correction  of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered  your  application on  26  March  2002.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this  Board.  Documentary  material  considered  by  the  Board  consisted of  your 
application,  together with  all  material  submitted in  support thereof,  your  naval  record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the  Board  considered the advisory 
opinion  furnished  by  NPC  memorandum  5420 N 130D 1102U0026 of  23 January 2002, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration  of  the entire record,  the Board  found that  the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable  material  error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application  has  been  denied.  The names and  vurc~ of 
the members of  the panel  will  be  filrnished upon  request. 

It  is  regretted  that the circunistances of  your  case are such  that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled  to  have  the  Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other  matter not  previously  considered  by  the  Board.  In  this regard,  it  is  important 
to keep  in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity  attaches to all ofticial  records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official  naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material  error or  injustice. 

Sincerely , 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF  THE  NAVY 
BUREAU  O F   NAVAL  PERSONNEL 
WASHINGTON.  D.C.  20370-5000 

IN  REPLY  R E F E R   TO 

5420 
N13 OD1 /  02110026 
23 Jan 2002 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subj:  COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN 

Encl :  (1) BCNR case file #06423-01 with microfiche service record 

1.  The . 

~  following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 

petition. 

2.  N130 recommends denial of Seaman 
Enlistment Bonus  (EB) . 

-- 

etition for an 

3 .   Seaman -enlisted 
Entry Program  (DEP) on 18 June 2001 and volunteered for the 
Advanced Electronics Field  (AEF) /  Electronics Technician (ET) 
School Guarantee.  seaman-requests 
that would allow payment of an EB. 

in the Navy through the Delayed 

- 

favorable action 

4.  EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to 
enlist in critical skills.  The EB program is budgeted based on 
quotas provided by the Commander, Navy ~ecruiting Command and the 
Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of  "A" School 
accession seats.  Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB. 
EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 
4.  Petty Officer -does 
service record and t  erefore is not entitled to an EB. 

not have an EB contract in his 

5.  BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned 
herewith as enclosure  ( 1 ) .  

Assistant, ~nl-i-sted Bonus 
Programs Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06687-01

    Original file (06687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In his petition, Seaman-claims that an EB was erroneously left out of his contract and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Seaman s processing electronic archived record reveals no offered EB quota.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08115-98

    Original file (08115-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. -is not entitled to both NCF and EB, and therefore is no longer eligible for EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03

    Original file (00320-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03

    Original file (01420-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02898-99

    Original file (02898-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~130~1/132-99 19 JUL 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN USNR, Encl : BCNR File # 02898-99 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny Seaman...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04692-01

    Original file (04692-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by of which is attached. EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01669-99

    Original file (01669-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 N130Dl/ 141-99 03 AUG 99 NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00762-03

    Original file (00762-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N130 recommends disapproval of for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) Colleg 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01458-03

    Original file (01458-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03210239 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05907-01

    Original file (05907-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/01~1407 19 Dee 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05907-01 with microfiche service record 1. Navy Recruiting Command and...