Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05907-01
Original file (05907-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF THE  

NAVY

BOARD 

FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

JLP:ddj
Docket  No: 
15 January 2002

5907-01

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,  sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N 
of which is attached.

/Ol U 1407 of 19 December 2001, a copy

130D 1 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000 NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON. D.C.

 

20350-2000

IN 

REPLY 

REFER 

TO

5420
N130D1/01~1407
19 

Dee 2001

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#05907-01 with microfiche service record

1.

The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman

petition.

N130 recommends denial of Seaman

2.
Enlistment Bonus  

(EB).

petition for an

3.
Seaman
Entry Prog
Advanced Electronics Field  
Field Program Guarantee.
requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB.

enlisted in the Navy through the Delayed
n 11 July 2000 and volunteered for the

- Submarine Electronics
In his petition, Seaman

EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the

4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
The EB program is budgeted based on
quotas provided by the Commander,
Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of "A" School
accession seats.
EB is guaranteed by an   EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4.

Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB.

Navy Recruiting Command and the

Seaman

oes not have an EB contract in his service record and
is not entitled to an EB.

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

5.
herewith as enclosure (1).

Assistant, Enlisted Bonus
Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04692-01

    Original file (04692-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by of which is attached. EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01

    Original file (03955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. D.C. 20350.2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER 542 0 N130Dl/ 6 Aug 01 TO OlU1198 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03955-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. does not have an EB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07826-00

    Original file (07826-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted ‘in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment Bonus (EB). In his petition, -claims his recruiter promised him an EB and Seaman requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04314-01

    Original file (04314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    his classifier could not establish whether Seaman Apprentice had ever received and EB and instructed him to petition the .an Other Service Veteran (OSVET), e Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 26 In his petition, he states that ection of Naval Records (BCNR) for an EB. Seaman Apprentice EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the The EB program is budgeted on quotas Navy Recruiting 4 . does not have an EB Contract in his At no other time may a member petition for an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06895-02

    Original file (06895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO591 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN w Encl: (1) BCNR case file #06895-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06423-01

    Original file (06423-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110026 23 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl : (1) BCNR case file #06423-01 with microfiche service record 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04268-02

    Original file (04268-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Seaman 2001. and signed an EB contract in the to Recruit Training Command (RTC) requests.favorable action that Kicker in addition to the EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. Correction of Naval Records, Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06687-01

    Original file (06687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In his petition, Seaman-claims that an EB was erroneously left out of his contract and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Seaman s processing electronic archived record reveals no offered EB quota.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04972-02

    Original file (04972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01056-00

    Original file (01056-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y N 0 S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 23 Mar 200 0 0~0212 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...