Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00593-01
Original file (00593-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD  FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 593-01
27 December 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 December 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N  
of which is attached.

Your allegations of error and

130D 

l/O1 U 1357 of 27 November 2001, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

1

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

OFFICE OF

  THE  CHIEF  OF  NAVAL OPERATION

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

N

WASHINGTON. DC

 

ZOJSO-2000

Y

S

IN REPLY REFER TO

5420
N130D11 01211357
26 Nov 2001

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

NAVAL RECORDS

-IBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

Subj:

PETTY OFFICER

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#04593-01  with microfiche service record

The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty

1.
Officer Schexsnayder's petition.

N130  recommends denial of Petty Officer

2.
petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

entered the Delayed Entry Program
teered  for the Nuclear Field (NF)

Petty Officer

He shipped to Recruit Training Command (RTC) on 7

3.
(DEP) on 23 October 1998,
Open School Guarantee and signed a contract for an EB of
$12,000.
December 1998.
nuclear training and was  
Technician 
petition,
that would allow payment of an EB

Petty Officer
reel

/ Advanced E
Petty Officer

for serving as an ET.

(ET/AEF). In his

Id 
requests favorable action

as disenrolled from
he Electronics

EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the

Members who fail to complete basic
including failure to graduate from

and who do not continue in the skill for which
The Navy offers an

4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
qualifications for the EB,
required school(s),
enlisted, will have the EB option nullified.
EB to members during the DEP or the reclassification phase of
recruit training.
elect the EB incentive or re-negotiate an EB enlistment.
member has started training in the skill for which they are to
receive an EB, the member cannot reclassify into another skill and
receive an EB. Petty Officer
Nuclear Field program for
into the ET/AEF Program.
not entitled to an EB.

academic failure and was
Therefore, Petty Officer

At no other time may the prospective recipient

Once a

was disenrolled from the

is

BCNR  case file with microfiche service record is returned

5.
herewith as enclosure  

I..

Subj:

D RECOMMENDATION

ASE OF PETTY OFFICER

i..'

Assistant,
Programs Branch

Enlisted Bonus



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04844-01

    Original file (04844-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. 01~1355 2DIDl MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #04844-01 with microfiche service record 1. 01 albeit he does not have requests favorable action Petty Officer -claims / Electronics \\ EB is not an entitlement, but a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04691-00

    Original file (04691-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2001. 20350-2000 N S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/olU0045 12 Peb 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #04691-00 with microfiche service record 1. D.C. 20350-200 N COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION USN, IN THE CASE OF PETTY The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04530-00

    Original file (04530-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (AECF/AEF) On 26 January 2000 Seamen In his petition, Seamen - Carlson requests payment of EB Program and He shipped to active EB is paid upon successful completion EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. member has started training in the skill for which they are to receive an EB, and receive an EB. EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06423-01

    Original file (06423-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110026 23 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl : (1) BCNR case file #06423-01 with microfiche service record 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04578-01

    Original file (04578-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 12 Sep 2001 OlU1248 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : Encl: record COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER USN (1) BCNR case file #04578-01 with microfiche service The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. Office N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer-petition for 2. an Enlistment Bonus (EB) as he has already received his EB. and the day a member ships to active...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00036-03

    Original file (00036-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer College Kicker EB contract in his service record and therefore is not entitled to a College Kicker EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03727-02

    Original file (03727-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Seaman Navy Recruiting Command and the ‘A" School does not have an EB contract in his service record and therefore is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04050-02

    Original file (04050-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nuclear Field Program he was disqualified from the Petty Officer Reed requests favorable action that would allow payment of $4,000 EB . basic qualification for the EB, from required schools and who do not continue in the skill for Petty which enlisted, Officer did not complete the required...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05042-01

    Original file (05042-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2 October 2001 5042-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01

    Original file (03955-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. D.C. 20350.2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER 542 0 N130Dl/ 6 Aug 01 TO OlU1198 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03955-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. does not have an EB...