Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00
Original file (05771-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 
20 March 2001

577140

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 8 15 of 13 February 2001, a copy of
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

WAVY 
S710 
YlLLllOTOl

CIRIOWWLL  
IltLDRlTY 

COMMAND
DRIVE

 

TW  

3805  5-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
via 
:
Subj:

PERS-OOZCB

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref:

BCNR PETITION ICO
(a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 22 Aug  00
(b) NAVADMIN 

050/00

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on 11 June 2000 for four years

to have sufficient obliserve for BUPERS orders 3169 to
SPAWARSYSCEN NEU DET PAC SD via TAD orders to NEC 1678 "C"
training at FLETRACEN SAN DIEGO CA.
time of reenlistment was 01 August 2000.

The petitioner's EAOS at the

b.

The petitioner received a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the

ETSW(OOO0)  rate at the time of reenlistment.
petitioner earned only 45 months of SRB due to his EAOS of 01
August 2000.

However, the

C .

The petitioner requests to change his reenlistment date to

01 August 2000 and receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement without
However, the petitioner transferred for BUPERS
monetary loss.
orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000.

d.

The petitioner was advised that he was eligible to sign a
1070/613  agreeing to reenlist at his EAOS of 01 August
Reference (b),

NAVPERS 
2000.
members to sign a NAVPERS 
at the completion of training without monetary loss.

established an opportunity for service

1070/621  extension and agree to reenlist

(1) The petitioner was ineligible to utilize the option(s)

offered in reference (b) because there was not a SRB offered for
NEC 1678 and the 
the petitioner would have passed through the zone "A" SRB window
on

01 August 2000 while in the student status.

ETSW(OOO0)  was eligible for SRB.

Additionally,

In view of the above,

2.
as is.

recommend the petitioner's record remain

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
Enclosure (1)

3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
is returned.

".

:

eenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02

    Original file (03215-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01

    Original file (04438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08159-00

    Original file (08159-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00

    Original file (08684-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02284-01

    Original file (02284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY 5750 YlLLlllDTOW ,LRSOWWEL COMMAND IWTEQRITY DRIVE TN 38055-0000 1160 PERS-815 11 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Subj: Ref: PERS-OOZCB BCNR PETITION ICO SNM's DD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02927-01

    Original file (02927-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the petitioner is not requesting SRB based on a However, d. Upon re-entry to active service, MEPS stations are tasked to review NAVET service members SRB eligibility for the present enlistment. The petitioner will be eligible to reenlist for a zone "A" "A" window of eligibility on 22 February However, the The member will Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO In view of the above, 2. remain as is. recommend the petitioner's record to This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for 3. the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00

    Original file (08169-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01407-01

    Original file (01407-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01

    Original file (02469-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05254-01

    Original file (05254-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum I60 Pers 8 1 I attached. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.