Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08881-97
Original file (08881-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON, 

D.C. 203704100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 8881-97
9 February 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N130C3/254-98 of 23 December 1998, a
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER 
copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has 
been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
aI1 official records. Consequently,
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to 
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE

  NAV Y

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
DC 20350-200

WASHINGTON. 

0

S

zz ’tf
‘7 
Ser 
23 

L)EC 98

  T O

Y REFER
N130C3/254-98

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS  

ICO

Ref:

(a) SECNAVINST 

7220.77D

Encl:

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#08881-97  w/Microfiche Service

The following recommendation concerning enclosure (1) is

1.
provided.

The petitioner is requesting retroactive sea duty credit

2.
(13Nov96  to 
70ct97) on his sea duty counter during his tour with
- member detached from
Commander Submarine Group TEN (ACC 320  
last permanent duty station (PDS) pending further assignment to
new PDS) .

Per reference (a), when the petitioner transferred on   13 Nov

3.
96 to Commander Submarine Group TEN, his CSP entitlement
terminated that day.
(13Nov96  to 
a period  
CSP qualifying vessel.
37, 
authority exists for

U.S.C., Section 305a) and no Service Secretary waiver

70ct97)  that he was not serving on board a
CSP entitlement is based on law (Title

The petitioner cannot be authorized CSP for

this matter.

Therefore, 

N130C
4.
petitioner's request
70ct97).

does not recommend approval of the
for retroactive credit of CSP  

(130ct96  to

Head, Pay and Allowances

Section 

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08310-00

    Original file (08310-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 13 March 2001 831040 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07440-98

    Original file (07440-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. DC 20350-200 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 30 Mar 99 N130C3/062_gg MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98

    Original file (05622-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02418-01

    Original file (02418-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 270304.3 when delay en route and proceed time are authorized and used, the day of departure from the old station and the day of arrival at the new...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06905-98

    Original file (06905-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) does not contain evidence to support the 4. petitioner's claim that an administrative oversight...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01601-98

    Original file (01601-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION Y S WASHINGTON. the following recommendation concerning The petitioner is requesting reimbursement of pay and 2 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02

    Original file (00167-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for vice his Permanent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07662-00

    Original file (07662-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a member who executes a no-cost move from a duty station with a higher BAH rate to a duty station with a lower BAH rate, when the member did not move dependents.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01426-02

    Original file (01426-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Los Angeles, CA (dependent location) vice New Orleans, LA (new duty station).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03186-01

    Original file (03186-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 200 1 reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNP...