DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP:ddj
Docket No:
13 March 2001
831040
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
‘were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER
of which is attached.
N130C3/01UOO72 of 1 March 2001, a copy
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OF NAVAL OPERATION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
N
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000
S
IN REPLY REFER TO
722 0
Ser
01 Mar 01
N130C3/OlU0072
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
Ref:
Encl:
(a) SECNAVINST
7220.77D
(1) BCNR Case File
Record
#08310-00 w/Microfiche Service
Per enclosure
1.
payment of Career Sea Pay Premium (CSPP) from 10
00, while assigned
onboard the USS OBANNON (DD 987).
(l), the petitioner is requesting retroactive
Ott 00 to 21 Nov
IAW reference (a) member who receiving CSP or CSPP will
2 .
continue while on authorized leave,
or while on an operational flight, but not for more than
consecutive days away from the vessel, provided the member
intends to return for duty on that vessel.
petitioner's Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) revealed that the
member was on authorized leave from 27
Ott 00 to 21 Nov 00 and
was discharged from active duty.
TDY, TAD, or hospitalization,
A review of the
30
Therefore,
N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's
3 .
request for retroactive payment of Career Sea Pay Premium (CSPP)
from 10
Ott 00 to 21 Nov 00 IAW reference (a).
Allowances Section
(N136Cl)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for vice his Permanent...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03186-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 200 1 reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05377-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 7220 N130C3/08U0636 and7220 N130C3/08U0638 of 4 September 2008, a copy each is attached. N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request to draw BAH at the with-dependent rate for the time period of 1 Mar 96 to 23 Apr 02. jrye Sud D. Silva Assistant, Pay...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01292-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: ddj Docket No: 1292-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07662-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a member who executes a no-cost move from a duty station with a higher BAH rate to a duty station with a lower BAH rate, when the member did not move dependents.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06982-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 6982-01 6 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02418-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 270304.3 when delay en route and proceed time are authorized and used, the day of departure from the old station and the day of arrival at the new...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03597-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 200 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. effective November 1995 to require recoupment of all unearned bonuses if the member was administratively discharged from the Navy for personality disorder. "JFX" defined Reference (a) was administratively as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08675-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this case the member's old PDS was not OCONUS so this article of the JFTR does not apply. 4. reassigned from a PDS in DC) and his dependents remained in the same residence as when the IAW reference (a) article U5222- member served at the old PDS.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00833-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.