DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 3 186-01
15 November 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title
IJ.nited States Code, section
IO of the
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 14 November 200 1
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNP memorandum 7220 Ser N
of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
. Your allegations of error and injustice were
,23 October 2001, a copy
13OCXOl U
I32
I of
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Enclosure
.
DEPARTMENT OF THE
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
NAV Y
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON. D.C.
20350-2000
IN REPLY REFER TO
7220
Ser
23
N130C3/01U1321
Ott
2MDl
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
Subj:
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
Ref:
Encl:
."-
(a) SECNAVINST
7220.77D
(1) BCNR Case File
Record
#03186-01 w/Microfiche Service
Enclosure (1) indicates a request for sea duty credit during
Squadron ONE while deployed
1.
the petitioner's tour at Amphibious
onboard USS PELELIU (LHA 5) from 10 Nov 97 to 6 Jan 98.
2. In accordance with reference (a), members assigned to the
predominance of ship-based staffs,
Fleet Marine Force units,
in either category A or B vessels, will receive cumulative
duty credit only when assigned to and serving in a qualifying
vessel.
sea-duty credit only for the actual periods that Amphibious
Squadron ONE was deployed
and mobile units that temporarily serve
sea-
the petitioner qualifies for cumulative
onboard USS PELELIU (LHA 5).
ship-based aviation units,
In other words,
3. A review of the petitioner's Master Military Pay Account (MMPA)
revealed that his sea duty counter was credited with sea duty from
13 Nov 97 to 5 Jan 98.
the petitioner's request for cumulative
counter and this case warrant no further action.
Therefore, N130 recommends disapproval of
sea duty credit to his sea
Assistant Head, Pay and
Allowances Section
(N130Cl)
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08881-97
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 37, authority exists for U.S.C., Section 305a) and no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08310-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 13 March 2001 831040 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00360
Intentions unknown.850423: Applicant surrendered to military authorities at 1700, onboard Naval Station Philadelphia, PA. (25 days UA).850426: Applicant commenced unauthorized absence at 0730, 85APR26, while being processed by NAVSTA Phila, PA for transfer to USS PELELIU (LHA 5) under technical arrest orders. Sentence: Confinement for 31 days, reduction to E-1, Bad Conduct discharge. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case,...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600390
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 000511: Point waiver granted for Postal Clerk program.010410: Retention Warning: Advised of deficiencies in performance and/or conduct (Violation of UCMJ Article 86, UA from appointed place of duty on nine separate occasions, 010101, 010103, 010114, 010119, and 010124-010127. As of this time, the Applicant has not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00895-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 895-03 24 June 2003 Dear This is in reference to provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. ydur application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600232
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Due to continued misconduct, AOAA J _was again awarded NJP on 020920 for violating my restriction orders. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02687-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5936 14
Petitioner claims that “ I reviewed the message about SDIP and found that I still qualify since I am not getting paid (Frocked) for E-6 and because of my promotion I can fulfill my orders and complete the minimum requirement of 24 months to be able to receive SDIP.” However, enclosure (1) is the only documentary evidence Petitioner submitted to support his claim of why he felt he was eligible for the SDIP. By the time Petitioner’s HYT was approved and he found out his HYT would only have...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600381
ND06-00381 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20060104. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.021114: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct - drug abuse.021202: Applicant advised of rights and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01550-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N13OE/06U0493, 5 September 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYOFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000 7220 Ser...