Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06994-01
Original file (06994-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCCddj
Docket No: 6994-01
14 May 

2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the  

IJnited States Code, section  

1552.

14 May 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on  
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by  
copy of which is attached.

your naval record and
III addition, the Board considered the advisory

nlemorandum 7220 Ser N  

130C3/021.10071 of 2 

I February 2002, a

CNO 

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
has been denied.   The names and votes of
the advisory opinion 
the members of the panel will be furnished

_ Accordingly, your application

upon request.

  found that the

 

 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
  on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
2000  NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000

Y

S

722 0
Ser 
21 Feb 2002

Nl30C3/02U0073

MEMORANDUM FOR THE  

EXECIJTIVE  DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO

Ref:

Encl:

(a) Joint Federal Travel Regulations, Volume  

I

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#06994-O]  w/Microfiche Service

Per your request, the fo

1lOW

inq recommendation concern

i 

ng

-.
enclosure 

(1) is provided.

2.
Enclosure (1) indicates a request for travel status correction,
tzs change or modify COMNAVRESFOR Active Duty for Special Work (ADSW)
orders, and several extensions or modifications to permit per diem
entitlement while being in a medical hold status from 7 July
3i) April 99 at Naval Air Station Atlanta.

 

9.7 to

A review of enclosure (1) revealed in orders from BUPERS

3.
Washington DC (PERS-252) DTG 2102072  
original ADSW orders were extended to more than
Therefore,
Duty Station  

(PDS) from   21 

Ott 1996.

NAS Atlanta is considered the petitioner's Permanent

Ott 96 that the petitioner's

  20 weeks.

The petitioner received many other modifications to extend

4 .
his ADSW orders due to his medical condition.
paragraph 
extended period is for 20 or more weeks,
from the date of the order directing the additional and or the
extended duty.

U7150-A4  subparagraph (b), when the prospective

no per diem is payable

IAW reference (a),

Subj:

DATIONS ICO

.*al

Therefore,

5.
request for Per Diem IAW reference (a).

N130E recommends disapproval of the petitioner's

&cJcndL

-.-

R. B. Woods
Head, Travel and Transportation
Allowances Section  

(N130E)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00165-09

    Original file (00165-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08708-01

    Original file (08708-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-n~ember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application o n 14 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereol', your naval record arid applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09213-07

    Original file (09213-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show authorization of ADSW orders for a period of 167 days to Kingston, Jamaica vice ADT orders.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on March 10, 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02404-01

    Original file (02404-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00050-02

    Original file (00050-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPS) from IAW reference (a), members seeking 12 June 1997 to 6 June 2001. appointment to be designated as medical officer who are on active duty as an officer must resign their commission, or as an enlisted person must request a discharge from active duty. active duty for any other period while In no case shall any member be Upon completion of the program para. Therefore, request for payment due to the petitioner and TLE IAW Reference (c).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00299-09

    Original file (00299-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130E2/09U0125, a copy of which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates that the petitioner was improperly authorized a rental car while assigned to the ii a> area on an Active Duty Training (ADT) Permanent Change of Station order of over 140 days. Such a change would violate a Comptroller General ruling that PCS orders may not be converted into temporary duty to increase entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08675-00

    Original file (08675-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this case the member's old PDS was not OCONUS so this article of the JFTR does not apply. 4. reassigned from a PDS in DC) and his dependents remained in the same residence as when the IAW reference (a) article U5222- member served at the old PDS.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00118-03

    Original file (00118-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01848-07

    Original file (01848-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1848-07 20 Mar 07From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj:REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORDRef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Temporary Active Duty (TAD) reserve orders issued as Active Duty for Training (ADT) were modifiedtoshow Active Dw~yfor Special Work {ADSW)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07037-01

    Original file (07037-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. than 139 days, station, Officer-Active Duty for Special Work (ADSW) orders were for a period of 90 days commencing 15 November 1999, as requested by reference (d). The gaining command provided for Petty-travel when the member resides more than 50 miles from the duty (c) stipulates that...