Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01
Original file (05176-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 5 176-01
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title IO of the  

United States Code, section  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 October 200  
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
menlorandum  1 
opinion furnished by NPC  
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

I of 23 October 2001, a copy of which

. Your allegations of error and injustice
I 

160 PERS-81 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision  
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

upon submission of new and material

ofticial records. Consequently,

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

: 

 WEL)
!. 0 / 24 / 01

14 :48

FAX 

 901 8742771

PERS 852

\

DEPART

THE NAVY
WAVT PERSONNEL COMMAND
DRIVE
IMLUNCTON TN 
~~055-0000

M ENT OF 
INTEORITT 

C7 tO 

11 
ll ””

cn

l? ERS - 011
23 

Ott  01

M E M ORANDU

FOR CHAIRMAN,

M 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Sub j 
:

BCNR PET

I T I ON 

I CO

R ef :

End :

(a) 
( b ) 
(cl NAVADMIN  
(1) BCNR File

SNM's  DD Form
MILPERSMAN  1160-100

149 d t d 15 

01
J un 

176/00

In  response to

1 .
petitioner's request.

reference (a),

 

recommend disapproval of the

a.

PERS  815 approved the petitioner on 14 August 2000 to
reenlist via the benefits of the STAR program non-specific "C"
school training for Course
NEC 1320.

of Instruction Number  

(GIN)  A-113-0187

b.

The petitioner reenlisted for six years on 28 September

aad  received a zone "A" SRB entitlement

2000 for the STAR program  
for the FT(OOOO) rate.

C .

Per reference  

( b ), Automatic advancement eligibility is

based on the Career Schools List in effect on the date of
reenlistment.

d .

Reference (c) released on 12 July 2000, listed the CIN

113-0187  on the CSL at the time the petitioner reenlisted.
However,
Class because he did not hold the NEC 1320 upon the date of
reenlistment.

the petitioner was

not advanced to Petty Officer Second

 

A-

e.

The petitioner submitted a request to have his current

NEC of 1327 changed to reflect 1320 however, the petitioner's
request came back denied.

f.

Pers-815 cannot: recommend approval for advancement to

do not hold the proper

Petty Officer Second Class if the member
NEC that's listed on the CSL.

In view  of the above,

2 .
remain as is.

recommend the petitioner's record

10
1 

/ 24

 WED 
/ 01

14:46

 FAX 901 8742771

PERS 852

@IO03

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO FT

, USN,

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for  

3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(1) is returned.

(BCNR)

only.

use  by
Enclosure

Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01

    Original file (03457-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01

    Original file (01109-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808650

    Original file (NC9808650.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - Petitioner requests to receive the Petty Officer Second eligibility back by reason of the STAR program. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02263-01

    Original file (02263-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the petitioner's advancement to Petty recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05735-01

    Original file (05735-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04573-01

    Original file (04573-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08443-00

    Original file (08443-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06174-02

    Original file (06174-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 5he Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02

    Original file (06172-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01

    Original file (00896-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).