Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807846
Original file (NC9807846.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380S5S-0000, IN REPLY REFER TO

1160
PERS-815
09 Jun 99

 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: PERS-O00ZCB

 

Subj}: BCNR PETITION @

Ref: (a) SNM's .DD Form 149 dtd 01 Oct 98
(b) OPNAVINST 1160.6A
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of

petitioner's request.

- Petitioner reenlisted on 15 Aug 1998 for 6 years and
received 64 months of zone “B” SRB entitlement for the EW(0000)
rate. Petitioner’s EAOS at the time was 10 Sep 1998 with an SEAOS
of 10 Feb 1999.

- Petitioner requests to receive 2 additional months of SRB
entitlement because the 2 month extension became operative on 10
Jul 1998.

- Petitioner signed the 2 month extension on 10 Jul 1998.
Petitioner’s EAOS at the time was 29 Aug 1998. Petitioner
reenlisted prior to the extension being operative. Extensions do
not become operative until the expiration of the hard EAOS. Per
reference (b), the SRB was’ not miscalculated.

2. In view of the above, recommend petitioner’s record remain as
is.

3. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure

(1) is returned.
WK

-

S. R. CHRISTY

Head,

Reenlistment Incentives Branch
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH:tj
Docket No: 7846-98
7 July 1999

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 PERS-815 of 9 June 1999, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of

the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06534-98

    Original file (06534-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 1995 the earliest petitioner was eligible to receive the SRB entitlement was 26 Jul...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99

    Original file (00120-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99

    Original file (02246-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, reference (b) was in effect at the time petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00381-99

    Original file (00381-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 11 Jul 99. petitioner reenlisted there were no SRB entitlements for the DK(0000) rating per reference (b). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03533-99

    Original file (03533-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner reenlisted on 18 Jun 1998 for 4 years and received the maximum zone "B" SRB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98

    Original file (08446-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99

    Original file (00809-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03873-99

    Original file (03873-99.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of session, considered your application on 19 January 2000. - Petitioner requests to cancel the 4 month extension of 17 Ott 96 and the extension signed on 15 Jun 98 to allow him to receive an additional 42 months of zone "B" SRB entitlement. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99

    Original file (00439-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03289-99

    Original file (03289-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 14 Apr 1999 to effect a reenlistment within the SRB eligible window of reference (c) and...