JEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECT
ION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
/”
4,
.e;J
”
P
MEH : ddj
Docket No: 3879-99
19 January 2000
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
Naval Records, sitting in executive
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of
session, considered your application on 19 January 2000. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board.
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 8 15 of 2 December 1999, a copy of
which is attached.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W . DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
INTEDRITY DRIVE
5720
Mll.LlNOTON TN
3805 S-0000
1160
PERS-815
Dee
02
99
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
BCNR PETITION ICO
Subj:
Ref:
(a)
(b)
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 07 Jun 99
NAVADMIN,047/98
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval to
- Petitioner executed a 4 month extension on 17
continue submarine Pay
EAOS at the time was 31 Jul 99.
onboard COMSUBGRU SEVEN.
Ott 96 to
Petitioner's
- Petitioner signed a 38 month extension on 15 Jun 98 to have
sufficient obliserve for BUPERS orders to COMSUBPAC PEARL HARBOR
HI.
- Reference (b), released on 12 Mar 98 with an effective date
of 1 Apr 98, did not carry a zone
ETSS rate the day petitioner signed the 38 month extension.
"B" SRB entitlement for the
a zone "B" SRB entitlement.
months of the SRB entitlement,
- Petitioner reenlisted on 30 Jul 99 for 6 years and received
However, petitioner only received 30
due to the SEAOS of 31 Jan 2003.
- Petitioner requests to cancel the 4 month extension of 17
Ott 96 and the extension signed on 15 Jun 98 to allow him to
receive an additional 42 months of zone "B" SRB entitlement.
- Petitioner was not miscounseled concerning the 38 month
extension because reference (b) did not carry a zone "B"
entitlement to advise petitioner.
In view of the above, recommend petitioner's record remain as
2.
is.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by
3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
(1) is returned.
Enclosure
.
-_
S. $lW
R.
Head
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, reference (b) was in effect at the time petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06491-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend disapproval of - Petitioner reenlisted on 20 Sep 99 for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07921-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (b) carried a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the RMSS rate at the time petitioner reenlisted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00375-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01678-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.