RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1200316
SEPARATION DATE: 20060123
BOARD DATE: 20121102
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (25F/Network Switching Operator), medically
separated for chronic right ankle pain. The CI had a sprain in 2003 with ligamentous laxity. On
1 February 2005 he had surgical repair with good stability, but persistent pain refractory to
treatment. The CI did not meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty
or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a
Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded chronic right ankle pain to the Physical
Evaluation Board (PEB). No other conditions were forwarded for PEB adjudication. The PEB
adjudicated the chronic right ankle pain condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the
US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI appealed directly to the
USAPDA, which affirmed the PEB findings. He was then medically separated with a 0% disability
rating.
CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in the
Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to
those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued
military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not
determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in
all cases. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside
the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board
for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service PDA – Dated 20060109
VA (4 Mos. 4 Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20060130
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Chronic Right Ankle Pain. The first visit for right ankle in the record was performed on
2 April 2002 after he sprained his right ankle. He was treated with an ace wrap and duty
limitations. He was seen again in 2004 for chronic right ankle pain. X-rays performed on 23 July
2004 were normal. An magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed on 18 October 2004 was
Condition
Chronic Right Ankle Pain
Code
5099-5003
Rating
0%
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Combined: 0%
Condition
Right ATFL Strain
Osgood-Schlatter’s Disease
5299-5261
0% X 1 / Not Service-Connected x 2
Combined: 20%
Code
5271
Rating
10%
10%
Exam
20060506
20060506
20060426
suggestive of strain of the anterior tibiofibular ligament (ATFL). An orthopedics evaluation, for
persistent pain, performed on 19 January 2005 was significant for a positive anterior drawers
and talar tilt. He underwent a Bronstom repair of the ATFL and regained stability, but had
persistent pain despite physical therapy. He did have improvement in his ROM with treatment,
though. An orthopedic note on 25 April 2005, 9 months prior to separation, noted dorsiflexion
of 15 degrees and normal plantar flexion at 45 degrees. His ankle remained stable. He was
seen again in orthopedics on 22 July 2005 and 14 October 2005 with persistent pain. He was
recommended for MEB at the latter appointment. There were two goniometric range-of-
motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which
the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.
Ankle ROM
Degrees
Dorsiflexion (0-20)
Plantar Flexion (0-45)
Comments
MEB ~2 Mo. Pre-Sep
VA C&P ~4 Mo. Post-Sep
Left
10
35
Right
5
30
R ankle negative anterior drawer
and talar tilt test. No additional
loss of motion with repetition
Left
-
-
Right
0
30
No instability to varus or valgus
stress; no pain with repetitive
motion. Sub-talar motion 20
degrees
10%
N/A
10%
§4.71a Rating
N/A
At the MEB exam performed on 1 November 2005, the CI reported pain and swelling of the
right ankle. The MEB physical examiner noted lateral swelling and reduced ROM. The ROM
was measured 2 weeks later in physical therapy and is in the table above. The narrative
summary (NARSUM) was dictated 23 November 2005, 2 months prior to separation. The CI
noted constant pain, but took no medications for it. No separate examination was performed.
At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed on 6 May 2006, a little over 3
months after separation, the CI reported daily pain without flares. He was limited in running,
but could stand for 3-4 hours and walk a mile. He used no assistive devices and had no
limitations in activities of daily living including recreation. On examination, he had swelling and
tenderness over the ATFL. Gait was non-antalgic. He had painless ROM and could rise on his
toes without difficulty. There was no instability or malalignment. X-rays showed medial
calcification with an intact ankle mortise. He was thought to have peroneal tendonitis. The
Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB
rated the ankle at 0% disability and coded it 5099-5003, analogous to degenerative arthritis
using the PDA pain policy. The VA coded the ankle 5271 and rated it 10% for moderate
limitations in ROM. The Board considered other coding options, but concluded that none
offered an advantage to the CI or were better descriptors of the condition than 5271 and that
the limitation in ROM was best described as moderate, which supports a rating of 10%. After
due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt),
the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right ankle condition coded 5271.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB
reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating ankle was operant in this case and the condition
was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the right ankle
condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5271 IAW
VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for
consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
5271
COMBINED
10%
10%
Chronic Right Ankle Pain
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120322, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120020616 (PD201200316)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.
Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s
recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating t0 10% without recharacterization
of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected
accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and
to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01137
He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The PEB also found the CI’s patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), hypertension, and chronic tension headaches to be Category III; conditions that are not separately unfitting and do not contribute to the unfitting condition.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board also concluded that the PEB properly subsumed the s/p tear of anterior talofibular and calcaneal fibular ligaments, and the...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01868
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The NARSUM dated 14 May 2004 (3 months prior to separation) documented that the CI reportedmild relief of the right ankle pain; feelings of instability, snapping of the ankle; inability to stand more than 20 minutes, and significant pain with activities. Upon worsening...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00038
The PEB adjudicated the chronic right ankle pain status post talar fracture condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Right Ankle Pain S/P Talar Fracture5099-500310%Chronic Right Ankle Pain and Limited Motion S/P Talus Fracture5273-527110%*STR↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓0% x 0/Not Service Connected x 0 Combined: 10%Combined: 10% *Failed to report to VA Exam...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00722
The VA exam noted painful right ankle ROM, as listed above. The VA rated the left and right ankle conditions separately as follows; coded 5271 painful limitation of ROM at 10% each for an overall rating of 20%. In the matter of the chronic bilateral ankle pain, due to right talar OCD lesion and left ankle chondromalacia condition, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated for two separate unfitting conditions as follows: left ankle chondromalacia condition coded 5014‐5271 and rated...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03858
The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (see rating chart below) for PEB adjudication.The Informal PEBadjudicatedthe left ankle pain as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Sep(20081011)Dorsiflexion (20 Normal)1515 or 20*Plantar Flexion (45)5040 or 45**the CI had two separate VA C&P exams on 20081011, with different ankle ROM resultsThe Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00042
Additionally, the MEB measurements are consistent with corroborating evidence; the MEB measurements are consistent with the diagnostic and clinical pathology in evidence; there is not a reasonable accounting for progressively impaired ROM in the fairly short interval between the MEB and VA examinations; therefore, based on all evidence and associated conclusions just elaborated, the Board is assigning preponderant probative value to the MEB evaluation. In accordance with VASRD code 5003...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00631
Although there was limitation of motion, the normal gait on multiple examinations was not consistent with a moderate limitation of motion for the minimum rating under this code. It noted that the VASRD states that the intent is that the painful joint is “entitled to at least the minimum compensable rating for the joint.” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) and VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00753
The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left ankle condition and that there was...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00517
invalid font number 31502 IPEB – Dated 20060915VA* - (~4 days Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Ankle Pain…5099-50030%S/P Left Ankle Arthroscopy Debridement…5271-501010%20061012Scar, S/P Left Ankle Arthroscopy Debridement…780410%20061012Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 8 RATING: 0%COMBINED RATING: 50% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20061108 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). Left Ankle Condition . The VA...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01820
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The gait was noted as being normal at the time of the VA C&P, over 5 months after separation and almost 11 months after the second surgery. The PEB and VA both adjudicated a 10% rating, the former citing the pain...