Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00517
Original file (PD-2014-00517.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD -2014 -00517               
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0707
Separation Date: 20061016

SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Light- W heel Vehicle Mechanic) medically separated for a left ankle condition . The left ankle condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Me dical Evaluation Board (MEB). “ L eft ankle osteochondral lesion of the talus” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “ chronic left ankle pain secondary to osteochondral lesion of the talus , status post ( s / p ) arthroscopic drilling of the talar lesion” as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : She was not evaluated for other conditions. Her complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
IPEB – Dated 20060915
 VA* - (~4 days Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Left Ankle Pain… 5099-5003 0% S/P Left Ankle Arthroscopy Debridement… 5271-5010 10% 20061012
Scar, S/P Left Ankle Arthroscopy Debridement… 7804 10% 20061012
Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 8
RATING: 0%
 COMBINED RATING: 50%
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20061108 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Left Ankle Condition . The CI reported left ankle pain in 1997 without a history of trauma . She fell and sustained a non-displaced fracture of the left 5 th metatarsal (part of the toe) in November 2002 . The left ankle CT scan performed in January 2004 showed an osteochondral lesion (cartilage damage or tear) in the ankle (talar dome) along with effusion (swelling). A left ankle X-ray performed in March 2004 was normal. A left ankle magnetic resonance imaging study performed in September 2005 showed the osteochondral lesion and an inflamed tendon. Throughout 2004 to 2006, the CI was followed by o rthopedics for chronic left ankle pain . She underwent a left ankle arthroscopy with subchondral ( under cartilage) drilling on 21 October 2005. Despite conservative and surgical intervention the CI continued to report left ankle pain and p hysical therapy note s throughout 2005 and 2006 documented joint pain localized to the left ankle and a poor response to aggressive treatment . The commander’ s statement in M ay 2006 documented that the left ankle condition prevented the CI from perform ing the duties of her MOS without extensive pain and the possibility of further injury. The MEB Narrative Summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 3 months prior to separation documented left ankle pain and an inability to run or do long marches. The examiner opined that the CI failed treatment and there w ere no further orthopedic intervention options . Physical therapy range-of-motion (ROM) and MEB physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam 4 days before separation documented a history of chronic left ankle pain. The examiner opined that t he CI ’s total functional loss equated to dorsiflexion limited to 30 degrees and mild physical impairment during flare-ups . The examiner also opined that repetitive use and motion would result in mild physical limitation; mostly associated with pain and lack of endurance . The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. There were ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Left Ankle ROM
(Degrees)
PT ~3 Mo. Pre-Sep
MEB ~3 Mo. Pre-Sep
VA C&P ~4 days Pre-Sep
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal)
 -5 -5 0 15
Plantar Flexion (45)
 30 35 40 35
Inversion 35-45
 20,25,25 35
Eversion15-25
 30,35,35 15
Comment
 Goniometer used; Pain with dorsiflexion Sensory nml; no pain on ROM; strength nml; TTP with flexion ; pain was elicited when passively flexed into PF antalgic gait; Unable to walk briskly; Pain with ROM; slight; mild TTP; strength 4/5 (ankle weakness) , sensory 2/4; severe ankle deviation inwardly; some instability when walking; mild pain and stiffness
§4.71a Rating
 20 % 10% ( 0% ) 1 0% (VA 10 % )
invalid font number 31502
The Board directed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB rated the condition at 0%, coded 5099-5003 ( Arthritis , degenerative [ hypertrophic or osteoarthritis ] ) . The VA rated the condition 10%, coded 5271-5010 ( Ankle, limited motion of - Arthritis , due to trauma, substantiated by X-ray findings ) . The Board considered whether the evidence supported a higher than 0% rating for the chronic left ankle pain condition. The Board noted the marked difference between the MEB ROM 3 months prior to separation and VA ROM performed 4 days after separation. The Board placed higher probative value on the VA exam because it was most proximate to separation and therefore; most closely approximate s the functional limitations associated with the left ankle condition at the time of separation . The Board determined that the 5 degrees decrease in ankle dorsiflexion and 10 degrees decrease in plantar flexion met VASRD code 5271 (ankle limitation of motion) criteria for moderate limitation of motion . The slightly antalgic gait, ankle weakness and pain also met criteria for a 10% rating IAW VASRD 4.59 (Painful motion) . The Board also considered analogous rating under c ode 5284 (foot injuries, other), but determined that this would not result in a higher than 10% rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the left ankle condition coded 5271-5010 .


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left ankle condition, the Board unanimously re commends a disability rating of 10% , coded 5271 -5010 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Left Ankle Pain 5271-5010 10%
RATING
10%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 131219 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150013360 (PD201400517)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00393

    Original file (PD2012-00393.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service (i.e., chronic right ankle pain following ankle strain); or, when requested by the CI, those conditions “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB”. The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00149

    Original file (PD-2014-00149.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Ankle Pain…50100%Right Ankle Surgery Residuals5299-527110%20050421Right Foot Nerve Lesion …8599-852110%20050421Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 5 RATING: 0%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050810(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The examiner concluded that the ankle pain was medically unacceptable, but the right foot nerve lesion was medically acceptable.At the VA Compensation and Pension...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01438

    Original file (PD-2013-01438.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board did not find evidence that supported more than a moderate deformity of the talus.The PEB listed sinus tarsi syndrome of the right ankle as a condition related to the primary unfitting right ankle condition but not separately ratable (Category II). Pes planus was noted on the MEB NARSUM examination however service treatment records reflect treatment for ankle pain but not for impairment due to pes planus.The condition was reviewed and considered by the Board. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00722

    Original file (PD-2012-00722.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA exam noted painful right ankle ROM, as listed above. The VA rated the left and right ankle conditions separately as follows; coded 5271 painful limitation of ROM at 10% each for an overall rating of 20%. In the matter of the chronic bilateral ankle pain, due to right talar OCD lesion and left ankle chondromalacia condition, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated for two separate unfitting conditions as follows: left ankle chondromalacia condition coded 5014‐5271 and rated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01306

    Original file (PD2012 01306.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “right ankle pain secondary to osteochondral fracture and surgery” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. At the MEB/NARSUM evaluation approximately 7months prior to separation, physical examination noted right ankle dorsiflexion of 5 degrees with crepitus without significant associated pain on motion. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00753

    Original file (PD2011-00753.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left ankle condition and that there was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00847

    Original file (PD2010-00847.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the left ankle condition (status post osteochondral allograft for an osteochondral lesion of the talus) as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00042

    Original file (PD2012-00042.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, the MEB measurements are consistent with corroborating evidence; the MEB measurements are consistent with the diagnostic and clinical pathology in evidence; there is not a reasonable accounting for progressively impaired ROM in the fairly short interval between the MEB and VA examinations; therefore, based on all evidence and associated conclusions just elaborated, the Board is assigning preponderant probative value to the MEB evaluation. In accordance with VASRD code 5003...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02413

    Original file (PD-2013-02413.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Ankle Decrease ROM and Chronic Pain527110%S/P Surgery, R Ankle with Deg Changes and Post-op Residuals527120%20071119Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 5 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00826

    Original file (PD2011-00826.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Ankles . The VA initially rated the C&P exam at 10% for each ankle using 5010-5271 (specifying ankle limitation of motion), with increase on appeal to 20% each side based on the same exam and VA treatment records through 26 May 2006 (approximately 17 months post-separation). In the matter of the bilateral ankle condition the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated for two separate unfitting conditions as follows: left ankle coded 5010-5271 and rated 10% and right ankle...