Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03858
Original file (PD-2014-03858.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-03858
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150129
SEPARATION DATE: 20080731


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 ( Nodal Network Systems ) medically separated for left ankle pain. The condition did not improve adequately to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. The CI was profiled for and was permitted to take the alternate aerobic portion of the Army physical fitness test. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “ c hronic left ankle pain, status post left ankle stabilization procedure , ” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 . The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (see rating chart below ) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated the left ankle pain a s unfitting, rated 10 %, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were found to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated .


CI CONTENTION: “Consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Army IPEB – Dated 20080429
 VA* – (~2 Mos. and 3 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Ankle Pain 5099-5003 10% Left Ankle Strain 5271 10% 20081022
Plantar Fasciitis Not Unfittin g Plantar Fasciitis and Tendonitis, Right 5284 10% 20081022
Plantar Fasciitis and Tendonitis, Left 5284 10% 20081022
Adjustment disorder Not Unfitting Anxiety Di sorder with Insomnia 9413 30% 20081004
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 5
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 60%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 90223 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) )

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Ankle Pain. In November 2005, just prior to deploying overseas, the CI injured his left ankle. He was bothered by left ankle pain during his year-long deployment, but he was able to successfully complete his tour. On return to home station, he was found to have a torn anterior talo-fibular ligament (ATFL). In May 2007, he underwent surgery to repair his left ATFL. After surgery, he continued to have problems with the left ankle. Due to the chronic, persistent nature of his ankle symptoms, MEB was initiated. The MEB physical examination (PE) was on 11 January 2008. The CI reported constant ankle pain, which was aching in nature, and worse with weight-bearing. With regard to functional status, he reported that he was unable to get in and out of small places. He was unable to climb in and out of shelters. He was unable to run, or do any heavy lifting. PE of the left ankle revealed some tenderness to palpation over the ATFL and at the distal fibula. Muscle strength was 4+/5 on eversion, 5/5 on inversion, and 5/5 on plantar flexion. Left ankle range-of-motion (ROM) was measured and is summarized in the chart below. On the DD Form 2808, dated 14 January 2008, it is documented that his gait was antalgic secondary to left ankle pain.

The CI was medically separated from service on 31 July 2008. On 11 October 2008, 10 weeks later, he had a VA General Medical Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam. He reported that the left ankle pain had caused pain in his back, hips, and knees due to an alteration in the way he walked. The examiner documented that the CI had a mild limp on the left ankle as he ambulated. PE of the left ankle revealed no joint effusion or tenderness. Left ankle ROM was full, with 20 degrees dorsiflexion and 45 degrees plantar flexion. Muscle strength was normal. On the same day, he had a VA Orthopedic C&P exam. The CI reported that his ankle pain was constant, with periodic episodes of sharp, severe pain. The pain was greatest in the lateral malleolar region. The left ankle pain prevented him from enjoying recreational activities (i.e. snowboarding), and it interfered with some normal household activities (i.e. shopping). On PE, the examiner noted that the CI’s gait was antalgic. PE of the left ankle revealed pain with inversion and eversion. There was no significant evidence of ligamentous instability, varus strain, or valgus strain. There was no warmth, synovial fluid, effusion, or muscle weakness. Left ankle dorsiflexion was 15 degrees, and plantar flexion was 40 degrees. With repetitive movement there was increased pain, fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance, and loss of coordination. Pain was the most significant factor.

The ROM evaluations, which the Board weighed in arriving at its recommendation, are summarized in the chart below.

Left Ankle ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~7 mos . Pre-Sep
(20080111)
 VA C&P ~ 2½ mos . Post-Sep
(200810 11 )
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal) 15 15 or 20*
Plantar Flexion (45) 50 40 or 45*
              *the CI had two separate VA C&P exams on 20081011, with different ankle ROM results

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Army PEB and the VA chose different coding options for the left ankle condition, but both assigned a 10% disability rating. The Board determined that the 11 October 2008 C&P exams were just 10 weeks after the DOS and therefore carried significant probative value. At one of those exams, there was full ROM of the left ankle. At the orthopedic C&P exam, there was a slight limitation of ankle motion. The left ankle condition was essentially non-compensable based on the VASRD §4.71a codes for the ankle (5270 through 5274). However; IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, when part of the musculoskeletal system becomes painful on use, it must be regarded as seriously disabled. A 10% rating is warranted when there is satisfactory evidence of functional limitation due to painful motion of a major joint. Because there was an increase in joint symptoms with repetitive motion, the Board considered whether a higher rating was justified IAW the legal ruling from DeLuca v. Brown (1995). The Board determined that the additional functional loss due to increased symptoms with repetitive use was not sufficient to justify a higher rating. There was no path to a higher rating for the left ankle since there was insufficient evidence of a significantly disabling joint abnormality that would justify a higher rating. After due deliberation, the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% was appropriate. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board found insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic unfitting left ankle pain.

Other PEB Conditions. Two other conditions (plantar fasciitis and adjustment disorder) were
adjudicated by the PEB as not unfitting, and therefore not ratable. The Board’s main charge with respect to these two conditions is to assess the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. These conditions were thoroughly reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board.

The Board determined that these two conditions (plantar fasciitis and adjustment disorder) were not specifically profiled, nor were they judged to fall below retention standards. There was no indication from the record that these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation, and in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the plantar fasciitis and adjustment disorder conditions. Therefore, no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic, unfitting left ankle pain, and IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, §4.59, and §4.71a, the Board recommends by majority decision no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the plantar fasciitis and adjustment disorder conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determination as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140825, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150011217 (PD201403858)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01403

    Original file (PD-2013-01403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bilateral foot condition, characterized as “plantar fasciitis (PF)” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board therefore, only reviewed to see if a higher combined rating was achieved with any applicable VASRD code. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01652

    Original file (PD-2013-01652.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “bilateral ankle pain and instability post Brostrom reconstruction” and “chronic foot pain due to plantar fasciitis” as unfitting, rated 0% and 0%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The PEB found the referred left knee condition as not unfitting. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Foot Pain due to Plantar Fasciitis5399-53100%Left Foot Plantar Fasciitis with Pes Cavus5299-502010%20040205Right Foot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01282

    Original file (PD-2013-01282.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Pes Planus with History of Plantar Fasciitis5299-52760%Left Plantar Fasciitis527610%20040602Right Plantar Fasciitis527610%20040602Other X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1520040602 Combined: 0%Combined: 50%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20041027(most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the presence of “breathing problems, sleep apnea, depression, knees” as sevice-connected conditions by the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01817

    Original file (PD-2013-01817.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The rating for the unfitting chronic recurrent plantar fasciitis bilaterally and equinus deformity bilaterally conditions are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. When considering a separate rating for each condition, the Board considers each bundled condition to be reasonably justified as separately unfitting unless a preponderance of evidence indicates the condition would not cause the member to be referred into the Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00316

    Original file (PD2012-00316.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded chronic right ankle pain to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). Sub-talar motion 20 degrees 10% N/A 10% §4.71a Rating N/A At the MEB exam performed on 1 November 2005, the CI reported pain and swelling of the right ankle. The VA coded the ankle 5271 and rated it 10% for moderate limitations in ROM.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01432

    Original file (PD-2013-01432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He reported sharp pains with “twitches “in his foot and legwith tingling,and numbness of the ankle and entire foot once a week.On physical examination, there was mild swelling of the inner aspect of the foot near the heel,with tendernessunder the arch of the left foot. At the MEB examon 13 May 2004, 12 months prior to separation, the CI reported mid-foot pain with continued activity. The Board reviewed to see if a higher evaluation was achieved with any applicable code.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01985

    Original file (PD-2014-01985.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the VASRD rules for rating the spine in effect at the time of separation thoracic and lumbar spine conditions coded IAW §4.71a are provided a single disability rating and thus the thoracic DDD and the lumbago (listed by the PEB as separate conditions) are subsumed in the §4.71a rating that follows. Since the disability due only to the left foot cannot be isolated by the clinical evidence or from the fitness implications of the bilateral condition, the Board consensus was that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00935

    Original file (PD2013 00935.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB combined the MEB referred conditions of FM and bilateral plantar fasciitis and pes cavus and rated them as one unfitting condition of FM coded at 5025, specified by the VASRD as “with widespread musculoskeletal pain and tender points, with or without associated fatigue, sleep disturbance, stiffness, paresthesia, headaches, irritable bowel symptoms, depression, anxiety, or Raynaud’s-like symptoms.” The PEB cited avoidance of pyramiding IAW VASRD §4.14 for not rating the plantar...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01239

    Original file (PD-2014-01239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PEB coded the left foot Injury condition as 5284 (other foot injuries) and rated at 10% for “ moderate.” The VA considered the left ankle sprain, s/p talus fracture with residual plantar fasciitis and rated at 20% for “…for marked limited motion of the ankle.” The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00967

    Original file (PD2011-00967.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bones as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The condition pes planus as requested for consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, is addressed below, in addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting conditions of bilateral stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bones. In the matter of the...