Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00689
Original file (PD-2012-00689.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

SEPARATION DATE:  20031020   

 
NAME:  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                                                             BRANCH OF SERVICE:  ARMY   
CASE NUMBER:  PD1200689 
BOARD DATE:  20121127   
 
 
SUMMARY  OF  CASE:    Data  extracted  from  the  available  evidence  of  record  reflects  that  this 
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E‐4 (88M/Motor Transport Operator), medically 
separated for chronic pain right ankle status post (S/P) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) 
of supination external rotation IV ankle fracture.  The CI injured her right ankle roller skating 
and underwent surgery.  She continued to have activity driven chronic pain. Her chronic right 
ankle  pain  condition  could  not  be  adequately  rehabilitated  and  she  was  unable  to  meet  the 
physical  requirements  of  her  Military  Occupational  Specialty  (MOS)  or satisfy  physical  fitness 
standards.  She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board 
(MEB).    The  MEB  forwarded  no  other  conditions  for  Physical  Evaluation  Board  (PEB) 
adjudication.  The PEB adjudicated the chronic pain, right ankle condition as unfitting, rated 0% 
with cited application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.  The CI 
made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating.   
 
 
CI CONTENTION:  The CI elaborated no specific contention in her application.   
 
 
SCOPE OF REVIEW:  The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined 
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the 
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.”  The ratings 
for  unfitting  conditions  will  be  reviewed  in  all  cases.    Any  conditions  or  contention  not 
requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain 
eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.   
 
 
RATING COMPARISON:   
 

Service PEB – Dated 20030818 

Condition 

Code 

Rating

VA (5 Mos. Post‐Separation) – All Effective Date 20031021

Code 

Rating 

Exam

Condition

Residuals of Right Ankle 
Fracture, Status Post‐Operative 
Open Reduction and Internal 
Fixation

Chronic Pain, Right 
Ankle... 

5099‐5003 

0% 

5299‐5271 

0% 

20040308 

↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ 

Combined:  0% 

0% X 1 / Not Service‐Connected x 3 

Combined:  0% 

 
 
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:   
 
Chronic Pain Right Ankle S/P ORIF of Supination External Rotation IV Ankle Fracture Condition.  
In June 2002 the CI sustained a right ankle injury while roller skating.  Two days post‐injury the 
CI underwent an ORIF of a supination external rotation IV ankle fracture with transsyndesmotic 
disruption.  Three months after surgery the CI continued to have pain and the transsyndesmotic 
screw  was  removed.    Despite  screw  removal,  physical  therapy,  analgesics,  and  activity 
modification, the CI continued to have persistent right ankle anterior pain with weight bearing 

Right Ankle ROM 
Dorsiflexion (0‐20⁰) 
Plantar Flexion (0‐45⁰) 

Eversion (0‐25⁰) 
Inversion (0‐35⁰) 

Comment:   

See comment

30⁰
 
 

6‐weeks post ‐op; Lack five 

degrees to neutral of 

dorsiflexion; moderate soft 

tissue swelling, 4+/5 

strength at end of available 
range; unable to perform 

single leg calf raise

0⁰
48⁰

70⁰ 
30⁰ 
10⁰ 
15⁰ 

Firm end point to dorsiflexion; 
“pain with attempts at further 

dorsiflexion beyond 0⁰”; 
moderate swelling; no pain 
on passive ankle motion; TTP 

No tenderness to palpation, 
normal gait and neurologic 
exam; mild functional loss of 
range of motion due to pain 

(see text) 

that  radiated  up  her  leg.    The  goniometric  range‐of‐motion  (ROM)  evaluations  in  evidence 
which  the  Board  weighed  in  arriving  at  its  rating  recommendation,  with  documentation  of 
additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.   
 

PT ~14 Mo. Pre‐Sep 

Narsum ~3 Mo. Pre‐Sep 

VA C&P ~5 Mo. Post‐Sep 

§4.71a Rating 

10%

10% (PEB 0%)

10% (VA 0%)

 
At the MEB exam, 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported pain worse with bad weather 
and  impact  activity.    She  reported  that  wearing  tennis  shoes  and  avoiding  impact  activities 
controlled  her  discomfort.    The  MEB  physical  exam  noted  tenderness  to  palpation  at  the 
anterolateral ankle region with moderate soft tissue swelling.  X‐rays demonstrated a healed 
fibular fracture with good alignment and no evidence of degenerative joint disease.  Her profile 
limitations were run at own pace and distance, no marching, and no PFT run, walk, or bicycle.  
The exam is summarized above, and did not specifically address gait.  At the VA Compensation 
and  Pension  (C&P)  exam  5  months  after  separation,  the  CI  reported  7/10  pain  with  10/10 
activity  dependent  painful  exacerbations.    She  reported  that  exacerbations  decreased  her 
functional level by 50%.  She reported inability to walk long distances, run, or jump.  She used 
Fioricet (narcotic) and topical pain creams for pain management.  She did not use a brace.  The 
VA exam demonstrated no tenderness to palpation, normal gait and normal anatomical ROM.  
The examiner’s diagnosis indicated “Right ankle fracture, status post ORIF with mild functional 
loss of range of motion due to pain.”   
 
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.  The 
PEB  adjudicated  the  chronic  pain,  right  ankle  condition  as  unfitting,  rated  at  0%,  and  coded 
5099‐5003 citing the USAPDA pain policy.  The VA coded the right ankle 5299‐5271, analogous 
to ankle limitation of ROM, and rated it at 0%.  The Board considered the C&P dorsiflexion of 70 
degrees was inconsistent with prior ROM measurements, or would have indicated significant 
ankle joint abnormality given the normal 0‐20 degrees normal ankle dorsiflexion ROM and the 
anatomy  of  the  ankle.    The  Board  adjudged  that  as  there  was  no  significant  evidence  of 
abnormal gait proximate to separation, that limitation of motion could not be characterized as 
“Marked”  (20%)  under  5271  (Ankle,  limited  motion).    There  was  no  evidence  of  ankle 
instability.  The Board deliberated between coding under 5271 as “Moderate” (10%) and use of 
code  analogous  5003  with  application  of  VASRD  §4.59  (painful  motion).    All  exams  indicated 
either  pain‐limited  ROMs  or  functional  loss  of  ROM  due  to  pain.    After  due  deliberation, 
considering  all  of  the  evidence  and  mindful  of  VASRD  §4.3  (reasonable  doubt),  the  Board 
recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right ankle condition coded 5099‐5003.   
 
 
BOARD FINDINGS:  IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.  As discussed above, PEB 
reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the right ankle condition was operant in this case 
and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board.  In the matter of 
the right ankle condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 

   2                                                           PD12‐00689 

 

5099‐5003  IAW  VASRD  §4.71a.    There  were  no  other  conditions  within  the  Board’s  scope  of 
review for consideration.   
 
 
RECOMMENDATION:  The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as 
follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:   
 

UNFITTING CONDITION

Chronic Pain Right Ankle Status Post (S/P) Open Reduction Internal 
Fixation of Supination External Rotation IV Ankle Fracture

VASRD CODE  RATING
5099‐5003 
10% 
10%
COMBINED 

 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
Exhibit A.  DD Form 294, dated 20120611, w/atchs 
Exhibit B.  Service Treatment Record 
Exhibit C.  Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SFMR‐RB 
 

 
 

 

 

 

           XXXXXXXXXX, DAF 
           President 
           Physical Disability Board of Review 

 
 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency  

(TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA  22202‐3557 

SUBJECT:  Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation  

for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120022729 (PD201200689) 

1.  I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review 
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.  

Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,   I accept the Board’s 

recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization 

of the individual’s separation.  This decision is final.   

2.  I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected 

accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.    

3.  I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the 
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and 

to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures. 

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

   3                                                           PD12‐00689 

 

Encl 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     XXXXXXXXXXXX 

     Deputy Assistant Secretary 
         (Army Review Boards) 

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 
CF:  

(  ) DoD PDBR 

(  ) DVA 

 

 

 

   4                                                           PD12‐00689 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00729

    Original file (PD2009-00729.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    On a follow-up VA exam for ankle and back pain performed on 21 May 2009 (nine days before separation) the CI was still complaining of right ankle pain, but the examiner noted no edema of the extremities and the CI’s gait was intact. The examiner also stated, “…he has great ROM in his ankle and seems to have good strength, so I do not think physical therapy will add much.” The CI was rated at 10% by the VA for pain with motion of the right ankle coded 5271 (Ankle, limitation of motion). In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01162

    Original file (PD2012 01162.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) adjudication.The IPEB adjudicated chronic right foot and ankle pain conditions as unfitting rated 10%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Right Foot and Ankle Pain5099-500310%Right Ankle Fracture (also claimed as right foot pain)527110%20021223No Additional MEB/PEB EntriesOther x 420021223...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00940

    Original file (PD2012-00940.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ankle condition, characterized as “Chronic right ankle pain…,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. The PEB adjudicated “Chronic right ankle pain…” as unfitting and rated 10% citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Pain Policy. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01144

    Original file (PD2012 01144.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “s/p left ankle bimalleolar fracture” as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). I believe that the Decision Board didn't take in consideration all the medical evidence in my favor thus making an erroneous decision; in this case: "when the disability was likely to have occurred or was aggravated, rather than make the assumption it occurred when the claim was originally filed, in addition this is a "faulty...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00503

    Original file (PD2009-00503.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for continued Naval service, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. Despite this treatment he continued to note activity limiting pain and instability in his right ankle. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00697

    Original file (PD2012-00697.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Code 5271 Rating 20% NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200697 SEPARATION DATE: 20031130 BOARD DATE: 20130111 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a National Guard SPC/E‐4 (31K10/Combat Signaler), medically separated for “chronic right ankle pain with loss of subtalar joint motion secondary to fracture of the talus (26 Jul 02),...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01107

    Original file (PD2012 01107.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “left distal femoral stress fracture” and “stress fracture right talus” as unfitting, each rated 0%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). If he is on steep ground, the ankle will roll.” The VA physical exam (normal gait as above) recorded, “the right ankle is tender anteriorly to palpation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00984

    Original file (PD2012-00984.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Ankle Pain Condition. Another C&P examiner that day reported “full range of motion, flexion, and extension of her lumbar spine.” Rotation and lateral flexion were also considered “full.” Moderate to severe tenderness and mild muscle spasm of the left paraspinal muscles was noted. The PT evaluation reported that pain was rated 10/10 by the CI, although a distinction between back, hip and ankle pain was not specified.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00706

    Original file (PD2009-00706.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB found the left ankle condition unfitting, and rated it 0%. Also many other conditions have been found that are service connected.” In block 14 of DD Form 294 the CI lists his VA rated conditions, so a contention for their inclusion in the separation rating is therefore implied. |UNFITTING CONDITION |VASRD CODE |RATING | |Left Ankle Pain, With Limitation Of Ankle Motion |5271 |10% | |(Moderate) | | | |COMBINED |10% | The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00025

    Original file (PD-2012-00025.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Wrist Condition . The CI was evaluated by multiple orthopedic specialists and after the MEB examination underwent repeat surgery for the OCD on 3 February 2005.A PT note on 15 August 2005 noted the CI reported doing “pretty well,” with improved ability to walk and decreased pain.At the MEB examinationthe CI reported right ankle pain. At a VA outpatient physical medicine evaluation on 9 November 2005, 2 months after separation, the CI reported right ankle pain despite two surgeries...