Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00940
Original file (PD2012-00940.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army

CASE NUMBER: PD1200940 SEPARATION DATE: 20030119

BOARD DATE: 20121019

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty 1LT/O-2 (88A, Transportation Platoon Leader), medically separated for a right ankle condition. He was initially injured as a cadet at an ROTC event and the ankle condition was further aggravated a year later while changing track on an M-1 tank. Despite physical therapy the CI could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or physical fitness standards. He was consequently issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The ankle condition, characterized as “Chronic right ankle pain…,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “Chronic right ankle pain…” as unfitting and rated 10% citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Pain Policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with that 10% disability rating.

CI CONTENTION: The application states “1) PTSD was not rated 2) Constant dry eye not described or examined properly 3) right wrist rated @0% not examined or rated properly & continues to worsen.” [sic].

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The requested conditions of PTSD, dry eye, and right wrist pain were not identified by the PEB and thus are not within the defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.

RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB – Dated 20021023 VA (~3 Mo. Post-Separation) – Effective 20030120
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic right ankle pain 5099-5003 10% Right ankle pain 5271 10% 20030417
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Gastroesophageal reflux disease 7399-7346 10% 20030417
0% X 1 / Not Service Connected x 3 20030417
Combined: 10% Combined: 20%


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic right ankle pain condition. The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Right Ankle ROM (measurements in degrees) PT ~18 Mo Pre-Sep MEB ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~3 Mo. Post-Sep
Dorsiflexion (0-20) 0 Lacks 5 15
Plantar Flexion (0-45) 45 50 35
Inversion 30 15 20
Eversion 15 10 10
Comment: Gait normal; diffuse tender; Pain with dorsiflexion Gait normal; tender anterior ankle; tender well healed scar; can stand on toes and heels
§4.71a Rating 20% 10% 10%

The narrative summary (NARSUM) indicated the initial right ankle fracture in May 2000 required surgery of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Subsequent re-injury the following year did not require additional surgery. Radiographs showed retained endplate and multiple screws in the distal fibula and medial malleolus. Post-surgical arthrogram was negative. Exam demonstrated painful and limited ankle ROM as charted above.

VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam (3 months post-separation) indicated tenderness and limited ROMs as summarized above. Radiographs indicated retained hardware and no significant osseous abnormality.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the ankle analogously to 5003 (Arthritis, degenerative [hypertrophic or osteoarthritis]) with application of the USAPDA pain policy and the VA rated the ankle at 10% coded 5271 (Ankle, limited motion) at 10% (moderate). The exam specified pain-limited motion which would warrant a 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion). All exams in evidence justified a 10% rating IAW VASRD criteria and neither coding choice was considered predominate.

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication PEB’s 10% permanent adjudication of the right ankle condition.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the right ankle condition was operant in this case and it was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the right ankle condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic right ankle pain 5099-5003 10%
COMBINED 10%

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120605, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

SFMR-RB

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency

(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120019882 (PD201200940)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.

This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Deputy Assistant Secretary

(Army Review Boards)

CF:

( ) DoD PDBR

( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00689

    Original file (PD-2012-00689.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the chronic pain, right ankle condition as unfitting, rated at 0%, and coded 5099‐5003 citing the USAPDA pain policy. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00835

    Original file (PD2012 00835.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication.The PEB combined the two MEB conditions and adjudicated chronic pain, right ankle and low back, rated as minimal/frequent, as unfitting, rated 0%,with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and theUS Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated witha 0% disability rating. The VA rated chronic lower back pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00316

    Original file (PD2012-00316.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded chronic right ankle pain to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). Sub-talar motion 20 degrees 10% N/A 10% §4.71a Rating N/A At the MEB exam performed on 1 November 2005, the CI reported pain and swelling of the right ankle. The VA coded the ankle 5271 and rated it 10% for moderate limitations in ROM.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01364

    Original file (PD-2014-01364.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Right Ankle Condition . At the MEB examination on 23 November 2005, 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported constant right ankle pain worsened by weight bearing activities or twisting of the ankle treated with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00722

    Original file (PD-2012-00722.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA exam noted painful right ankle ROM, as listed above. The VA rated the left and right ankle conditions separately as follows; coded 5271 painful limitation of ROM at 10% each for an overall rating of 20%. In the matter of the chronic bilateral ankle pain, due to right talar OCD lesion and left ankle chondromalacia condition, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated for two separate unfitting conditions as follows: left ankle chondromalacia condition coded 5014‐5271 and rated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00184

    Original file (PD-2014-00184.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain Bilateral Thighs, Ankles, and Feet5099-500310%Chronic Right Ankle Sprain…527110%20061107Chronic Left Ankle Sprain…527110%20061107Bilateral Pes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00038

    Original file (PD2012-00038.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic right ankle pain status post talar fracture condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Right Ankle Pain S/P Talar Fracture5099-500310%Chronic Right Ankle Pain and Limited Motion S/P Talus Fracture5273-527110%*STR↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓0% x 0/Not Service Connected x 0 Combined: 10%Combined: 10% *Failed to report to VA Exam...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01642

    Original file (PD 2012 01642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20030321VA –STR UsedConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Ankle Pain Secondary to Bone Effusion Effect5099-500310%Sprain, Left Ankle 5299-527110%STROther x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 5STR Rating: 10%Rating: 10%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20030711(most proximate to date of separation) Left Ankle Condition .The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI had a history of multiple sprains of the ankle and experienced an avulsion...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02352

    Original file (PD-2013-02352.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active dutyE-4(Unit Supply Specialist)medically separated for left ankle pain.The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirementsof his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS).He was issued a permanent L3 profileand referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The “left ankle pain status post reconstructive surgery” was forwarded to the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01115

    Original file (PD-2013-01115.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Likewise, this degree of limitedmotion is not consistent with the ability to run 300 meters (as the CI reported he could do), to perform some activities allowed on his permanent profile, or to complete alternate aerobic fitness events.Finally, the VA note 6 months after separation suggested that the ankle pain was not “constant” as previously reported by the NARSUM examiner. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by...