Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00364
Original file (PD-2012-00364.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

   BRANCH OF SERVICE:  ARMY 

SEPARATION DATE:  20071013 

 
NAME:  XXXXXXXXX 
CASE NUMBER:  PD1200364 
BOARD DATE:  20121128 
 
 
SUMMARY  OF  CASE:    Data  extracted  from  the  available  evidence  of  record  reflects  that  this 
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E‐5 (62B20 /Construction Equipment Repairer), 
medically separated for right knee arthritis after direct injury to the knee in 2002 from a fall on 
the  ice.    The  CI  had  two  arthroscopic  procedures  including  micro‐fracture  debridement  and 
partial menisectomy initially and a later plica excision.  However, in 2006 his pain increased and 
did  not  improve  adequately  with  treatment  and  the  CI  was  unable  to  meet  the  physical 
requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards.  
He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).  The 
MEB forwarded osteoarthritis, right knee, mild moderate to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) 
for adjudication.  The MEB forwarded no other conditions.  The PEB adjudicated the right knee 
arthritis  condition  as  unfitting,  rated  0%,  with  possible  application  of  the  US  Army  Physical 
Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.  The CI made no appeals and was medically separated 
with a 0% disability rating.   
 
 
CI CONTENTION:  “I feel the rating was unfair from the Service considering the rating I have 
received from VA.” 
 
 
SCOPE OF REVIEW:  The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined 
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the 
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.”  The ratings 
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases.  The unfitting right knee arthritis condition 
meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview and is accordingly addressed 
below. The remaining conditions rated by the VA at separation and listed on the DD Form 294 
application are not within the Board’s purview.  Any conditions or contention not requested in 
this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for 
future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.   
 
 
RATING COMPARISON:   
 

VA (4 Mos. Post‐Separation) – All Effective Date 20071013

Combined:  0% 

*Increased  to  70%  effective  20101019  after  addition  of  9411  PTSD  at  50%  effective  20101019  and  5017  Gout, 
Right Great Toe at 0% effective 20090623. 
 
 

Service IPEB – Dated 20070712 
Condition 

Rating 

Right Knee Arthritis  

0% 

Code 
5003 

↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ 

Condition

Chondromalacia Right Knee Status Post
Meniscus Repair X 2
Right Shoulder Arthritis with Partial 
Thickness Tear of Supraspinatus Tendon
Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease with 
Sciatic Radiculopathy and History of Strain
Bilateral Tinnitus

Code 
5259 

5003 

5243 
6260 

Rating 
10% 

20% 

10% 
10% 

Exam

20080222 

20080813 

20080222 
20080813

0% X 4 / Not Service‐Connected x 4 

Combined:  40%*

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:  The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that suggests ratings should 
have been conferred for other conditions documented at the time of separation.  The Board 
wishes to clarify that it is subject to the same laws for disability entitlements as those under 
which  the  Disability  Evaluation  System  (DES)  operates.    While  the  DES  considers  all  of  the 
member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions 
that cut short a member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of 
final  disposition.    However  the  Department  of  Veterans  Affairs  (DVA),  operating  under  a 
different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service‐
connected conditions and to periodically reevaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting 
the  Veteran’s  disability  rating  should  the  degree  of  impairment  vary  over  time.    The  Board 
utilizes  DVA  evidence  proximal  to  separation  in  arriving  at  its  recommendations;  and,  DoDI 
6040.44 defines a 12‐month interval for special consideration to post‐separation evidence.  The 
Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6040.44, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES 
fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation and is limited 
to  conditions  adjudicated  by  the  PEB  as  either  unfitting  or  not  unfitting.    Post‐separation 
evidence therefore is probative only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability and 
fitness implications at the time of separation. 
 
Right  Knee  Arthritis  Condition. 
  There  were  two  goniometric  range‐of‐motion  (ROM) 
evaluations  in  evidence,  with  documentation  of  additional  ratable  criteria,  which  the  Board 
weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.   

 

Right Knee ROM 

Flexion (140⁰ Normal) 
Extension (0⁰ Normal) 

Comment 

MEB NARSUM ~ 4.5 Mos. 

Pre‐Separation
Not measured
Not measured

Diffuse tenderness throughout 
medial and lateral aspects with 
anterior somewhat more tender than 
posterior; no effusion; negative 
anterior drawer; MCL and LCL were 
stable; Lachman’s test negative; 
McMurray’s test negative; negative 
apprehension sign; minimal 
patellofemoral crepitus.

PT ~3.5 Mos.  
Pre‐Separation

135⁰ (135, 135, 135)

‐5⁰ (‐5, ‐5, ‐5)

Active 
measurements 
made with a 
goniometer.  
Negative Lachman’s 
test. 

§4.71a Rating 

10%

VA C&P ~4 Mos.  
Post‐Separation

120⁰ 
0⁰ 

Slight pain with locking and 
full extension; decreased 
flexion due to body habitus; 
negative Lachman’s anterior 
and posterior drawer and 
McMurray tests; normal gait; 
no assistive devices; normal 
neurologic examination 

10% 

 
The  MEB  narrative  summary  (NARSUM)  was  completed  approximately  4.5  months  prior  to 
separation.  The CI originally injured his right knee in early 2002 when he suffered a direct blow 
after falling on the ice.  His pain failed to resolve and he underwent an arthroscopy by a local 
German  physician  in  May  2002  with  microfracture  debridement  of  medial  femoral  condyle, 
excision  of  a  mediopatellar  plica,  and  a  partial  meniscectomy.    Magnetic  resonance  imaging 
(MRI) from August 2002 was normal.  He underwent a second arthroscopy with debridement in 
October 2002.  In January 2003, the CI had an antalgic gait but full active ROM.  His knee pain 
never completely resolved and it increased after he started running again about a year after the 
second  surgery.    In  January  2004,  a  permanent  L2  profile  was  written  for  degenerative  joint 
disease (DJD) of the right knee and avoidance of all running was recommended.  In April 2006, a 
permanent L3 profile was written for lower back pain with degenerative disc disease (DDD) and 
this  recommended  avoidance  of  running.    Repeat  right  knee  MRI  in  April  2007  was  normal.  
Pertinent  examination  findings  are  noted  in  the  chart  above.    The  MEB  NARSUM  examiner 
opined the right knee arthritis was mild to moderate.  A VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) 
exam  was  completed  approximately  4  months  after  separation  and  it  noted  a  similar  clinical 
history of the right knee condition.  Additionally, the CI reported knee subluxation occurring 4 
times per day, especially with lifting or carrying something heavy.  He also reported occasional 

   2                                                         PD1200364 
 

weakness  and  constant  stiffness  and  swelling.    He  was  wearing  a  neoprene  sleeve  at  the 
examination.  His pain occurred daily and was worse in the morning.  Pertinent examination 
findings are in the chart.  
 
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.  The 
PEB rated right knee arthritis at 0% for arthritis of one major joint, stating passive ROM was 7 to 
140  degrees  and  this  was  not  independently  ratable.    It  is  possible  that  the  PEB  applied  the 
USAPDA  pain  policy  although  this  is  not  specifically  stated.    The  VA  rated  right  knee 
chondromalacia,  status  post  meniscal  repair  and  applied  a  10%  disability  rating  using  VASRD 
5259.  The 10% rating is based on the presence of symptoms after meniscal repair.  The rating 
criteria for 5003 states:  “When however, the limitation of motion of the specific joint or joints 
involved is noncompensable under the appropriate diagnostic codes, a rating of 10 pct [sic] is 
for  application  for  each  such  major  joint  or  group  of  minor  joints  affected  by  limitation  of 
motion, to be combined, not added under diagnostic code 5003.”  Based on the limitation of 
active flexion to 135 degrees, a 10% disability rating is warranted.  The VA rating scheme, while 
equally  valid,  offers  not  advantage  to  the  CI.    After  due  deliberation,  considering  all  of  the 
evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and VASRD §4.59 (painful motion), the 
Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right knee arthritis condition. 
 
 
BOARD FINDINGS:  IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.  As discussed above, PEB 
reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the right knee arthritis condition was potentially 
operant  in  this  case  and  the  condition  was  adjudicated  independently  of  that  policy  by  the 
Board.  In the matter of the right knee arthritis condition, the Board unanimously recommends 
a  disability  rating  of  10%,  coded  5003  IAW  VASRD  §4.71a.    There  were  no  other  conditions 
within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.   
 
 
RECOMMENDATION:  The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as 
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:   
 

UNFITTING CONDITION

VASRD CODE  RATING

5003 

COMBINED 

10%
10%

Right Knee Arthritis 

 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
Exhibit A.  DD Form 294, dated 20120414, w/atchs 
Exhibit B.  Service Treatment Record 
Exhibit C.  Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

           XXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF 
           President 
           Physical Disability Board of Review 

   3                                                         PD1200364 
 

SFMR‐RB 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency  

(TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA  22202‐3557 

SUBJECT:  Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation  

For XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120022690 (PD201200364) 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

 

1.  I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review 
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.  

Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,   I accept the Board’s 

recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization 

of the individual’s separation.  This decision is final.   

2.  I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected 

accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.    

3.  I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the 
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and 

to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures. 

 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

Encl 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     XXXXXXXXXXXX 

     Deputy Assistant Secretary 
         (Army Review Boards) 

 

 

 
CF:  

(  ) DoD PDBR 

(  ) DVA 

 

 

 
 

   4                                                         PD1200364 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00726

    Original file (PD2011-00726.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “MEB and PEB only looked at Patellofemoral Syndrome for 1 knee. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination completed in April 2005 noted a long history of bilateral patellofemoral syndrome that had not resolved with bilateral physical therapy, bilateral Synvisc injections, limited duty for bilateral knees, and right knee surgical lateral release and synovitis debridement. The VA C&P examination did measure the ROM of the left knee and it was normal.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01103

    Original file (PD2012-01103.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. RATING COMPARISON: Service PEB – Dated 20030106 Code Condition Right Knee Pain S/P ACL 5099-5003 Reconstruction ↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ Combined: 10% *VARD dated 20090923 changed the code to 5010-5260 but the rating remained at 10%. Post-Separation) – All Effective...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00386

    Original file (PD2010-00386.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Knee Condition . The Board considered that the MEB’s “7mm free body” (right knee) condition is considered in the overall knee ratings and is not separately ratable. Other Conditions .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01029

    Original file (PD2011-01029.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the PEB adjudicated “bilateral knee” as the unfitting condition, the record of proceedings reflects separate codes and ratings for each knee, with application of the bilateral factor in computing the combined rating, which is consistent with VASRD standards. No other conditions were service-connected with a compensable rating by the VA within 12 months of separation or contended by the CI. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00017

    Original file (PD2010-00017.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the left patellofemoral arthritis condition as unfitting, rated 10%; additionally left open patella fracture condition was considered category II, a related condition that is not separately unfitting; with application of SECNAVINST 1850.4E respectively. Service Treatment Record In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00092

    Original file (PD2013 00092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as left knee severe degenerative joint disease (DJD), left knee anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, left knee lateral meniscus tear and medial meniscus tear, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. He had further knee re-injuries after the first two surgeries. The operative report described severe chondromalacial changes in the lateral compartment with osteophytic ridging in the patellofemoral joint, medial,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01692

    Original file (PD-2014-01692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “traumatic osteoarthritis left knee, with OCD lesions, lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau, s/p ACL reconstruction and microfracture of left femoral condyle”as a single unfitting condition, rated 10%,with likely application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appealsand was medically separated. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00815

    Original file (PD-2012-00815.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated right knee pain (PFPS) as unfitting rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam R PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME 5099-5003 0% RESIDUALS OF R KNEE INJURY, S/P MENISCAL REPAIR, PATELLOFEMORAL SYNDROME 5257 10%* 20030730 INTERMITTENT LBP Not Unfitting NO VA ENTRY R INTER TROCHANTERIC SCLEROTIC...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01364

    Original file (PD-2013-01364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated left knee ACL deficiency surgically treated as unfitting, rated at 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). I am in pain all the time, and additional surgery has been recommended. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00389

    Original file (PD2011-00389.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The multiply-operated left knee with anteromedial knee pain, subjective instability and mechanical symptoms condition, analogously coded 5299-5003, per VASRD direction, would warrant a 10% rating as given by the PEB and the VA. With non-compensable ROM...