Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01364
Original file (PD-2013-01364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01364
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY  BOARD DATE: 20141112
SEPARATION DATE: 20040709


SUMMARY OF CASE: The available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty CM3/E-4 (CM3 / Construction Mechanic Third Class) medically separated for a knee injury. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Rating or physical fitness standards, so he was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The knee condition, characterized as “left knee anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency surgically treated , ” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (left knee tibial tubercle avulsion fracture, surgically treated and left knee early degenerative changes) for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) a djudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated left knee ACL deficiency surgically treated as unfitting, rated at 10% with application of the V eterans A ffairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining left knee early degenerative changes and left knee tibial tubercle avulsion fracture, surgically treated conditions were determined to be C ategory II conditions. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Due to my condition, I am no longer able to do the job the military trained me to do. I am in pain all the time, and additional surgery has been recommended. I am also having lower back pain and issues with bending, lifting and kneeling. Also, I am having issues with my right knee. I am unable to stand for long periods of time, and have trouble doing normal everyday tasks. My orothopedic [sic] surgeon advised my first surgery was incorrectly, and has recommended it be re-done.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting knee conditions are addressed below. The contended low back and right knee conditions were not identified by the PEB; and, thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. No additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veteran
s Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.




RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 200400423
VA* 20130924 based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency Surgically Treated 5099-5003 10% Residuals, Left Knee A CL Repair with Patella Tendon Allograft 5260-5010 10% STR
Left Knee Early Degenerative Changes Cat II
Left Knee Tibial Tubercle Avulsion Fracture, S urgically Treated Cat II
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
Other x 1
Combined: 10%
Combined: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20130924


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Knee Condition. The CI had a left knee injury after a motorcycle accident on 4 March 2002 when he fell and hyperextended the knee with pain after walking. He underwent the first knee surgery on 2 April 2002 for removal of a left knee tibial eminence avulsion fracture fragment, and debridement of the ACL. He had a second surgery on 7 May 2002 for ACL reconstruction and autograft. By 9 October 2002, he had returned to full activity. At that time, examination revealed full left knee range-of-motion (ROM) and a plus one positive Lachman’s Test for ACL instability with a fixed end point and found fit for full duty by orthopedics. On 20 June 2003 he was seen in clinic for left knee pain with recent running, and had been on light duty on and off. He was evaluated by orthopedic surgery on 18 August 2003 and the CI reported left knee pain around the patella with activity, without locking, no giving out and no swelling. The physical examination found a stable knee, without anterior drawer sign, negative Lachman’s, no joint line tenderness, no patellar tenderness, no effusion, and well healed surgical scars, ROM was 0 to 125 degrees.

The narrative summary on 16 January 2004 (7 months prior to separation), noted the CI continued to have pain and buckling of the left knee. The CI reported inability to kneel, squat, or run. Physical examination revealed a positive Lachman’s test of four to five millimeters with a questionable end-point (positive for ACL instability) and a trace positive pivot shift test. X-ray findings were ACL reconstruction as well as minor degenerative changes of the left knee joint. There were no VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exams in evidence.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Board considered VASRD analogously codes 50995003 (degenerative arthritis), used by the PEB for a 10% rating. The Board did not find compensable ROM for the knee and no X-ray evidence of involvement of two or more major joints or occasional incapacitating exacerbations for a higher rating under this code. The Board considered codes 5260 (leg, limitation of flexion) and 5010 (arthritis, due to trauma, substantiated by X-ray findings) used by the VA for a 10% rating, 9 years after separation, without the benefit of a C&P examination due to no-show. The VASRD instructs to rate 5010 (arthritis due to trauma) as 5003 (degenerative arthritis) already discussed above. The Board did not find evidence of left knee locking pain, effusion of the joint, recurrent subluxation or lateral instability, for alternate or additional coding options providing a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130913, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record




                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review



MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 8 Apr 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:

- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN



                                                      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                            Assistant General Counsel
                  (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00094

    Original file (PD2009-00094.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    If used, it would most likely be at the "Moderate" knee disability 20% level considering the totality of CI's knee exam and post-separation VA exam which demonstrated no worsening of CI's knee condition. In the matter of the Right Knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends separately coding the instability and painful motion of the CI's right knee with a rating of Chronic right knee instability s/p trauma, 5010-5257 at 20% and Right knee pain limited motion s/p trauma, 5010-5260 at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02131

    Original file (PD-2013-02131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the history of the injuries and immediate surgeries are presented together in an introduction, followed by separate discussions of the two residual conditions identified by the PEB and adjudicated as unfitting.The Board also noted that the MEB forwarded five RLE conditions to the PEB and the PEB characterized two unfitting conditions: “right knee pain,” which included the MEB listed conditions of right anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) avulsion, post-operative knee arthrofibrosis,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00064

    Original file (PD 2014 00064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Board will consider the Category II condition as stated above, in its review of the unfitting right knee condition. Right Knee Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01937

    Original file (PD-2013-01937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the evidence reasonably supported pain limited motion for a disability rating of 10%; analogous to limitation of motion, coded 5299-5260.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right knee instabilityand 10% for the right knee limitation of motion for a combined 20% disability rating. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00092

    Original file (PD2013 00092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as left knee severe degenerative joint disease (DJD), left knee anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, left knee lateral meniscus tear and medial meniscus tear, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. He had further knee re-injuries after the first two surgeries. The operative report described severe chondromalacial changes in the lateral compartment with osteophytic ridging in the patellofemoral joint, medial,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00494

    Original file (PD2011-00494.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flexion (140⁰ normal)“approximately 0 to 125⁰”100⁰110⁰Extension (0⁰ normal)0⁰0⁰CommentVarus deformity, palpable femoral osteophytes, scar, crepitus, TTP, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg McMurray’s, mildly pos patellar grind3+ effusion, TTP (medial joint line & lat epicondyle), 30 ml normal joint fluid aspirated, steroid injected; Hx incr pain & effusion due to moving over last 2-3 wks, no lockingPainful motion, crepitus, scar nontender, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01029

    Original file (PD2011-01029.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the PEB adjudicated “bilateral knee” as the unfitting condition, the record of proceedings reflects separate codes and ratings for each knee, with application of the bilateral factor in computing the combined rating, which is consistent with VASRD standards. No other conditions were service-connected with a compensable rating by the VA within 12 months of separation or contended by the CI. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01692

    Original file (PD-2014-01692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “traumatic osteoarthritis left knee, with OCD lesions, lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau, s/p ACL reconstruction and microfracture of left femoral condyle”as a single unfitting condition, rated 10%,with likely application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appealsand was medically separated. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01456

    Original file (PD-2013-01456.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam DJD,Bilateral Knees...[Surgical Residuals]500320%Left Knee DJD, post Meniscectomy5010-525910%20031208Right Knee DJD, post ACL Repair5010-526010%20031208Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 4 (Including 0% R and L Knee Surgical Scars)20031208 Combined: 20%Combined: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20040310 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Bilateral Knee Condition . In the matter of the combined bilateral knee...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00622

    Original file (PD2012-00622.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Sep 135⁰ 0⁰ 140⁰ 0⁰ ROM additionally limited by pain; slight anterior subluxation with some instability 10% 10%* Left Knee ROM Flexion (140⁰ Normal) Extension (0⁰ Normal) Comment §4.71a Rating 5099-5003 or 5010 5257 +painful motion and tenderness; 1A Lachman, +anterior drawer 10% 10%* *If instability conceded At the narrative summary (NARSUM) examination performed 3 months prior to separation (2 August 2002), the CI reported sharp anterior knee pain when twisting, and occasional swelling...