Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01180
Original file (PD2010-01180.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: army

CASE NUMBER: PD1001180 SEPARATION DATE: 20091102

BOARD DATE: 20120111

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (13F, Fire Support) medically separated for varicose veins of the left leg. He was treated, but did not respond adequately to fully perform his military duties or meet physical fitness standards. He underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The varicose vein condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. Five other conditions, identified in the rating comparison chart below, were listed on the DA Form 3947 as medically acceptable. The PEB found the left leg varicose veins unfitting, and assigned a rating of 20%. The CI accepted the PEB findings, and waived a formal hearing. He was thus separated with a 20% disability rating, IAW applicable Army and DoD regulations.

CI CONTENTION: The CI states, “The Veterans Administration through medical testing found a TBI that was received in line of duty. Line of duty TBI due to motor vehicle accident was not diagnosed during active duty. The VA tested and found it. Tinnitus was reported to medical staff at Ft Drum. However, no treatment was provided. Varicose veins only my left leg was considered in evaluation, my right leg is affected as well as evidenced by VA letter.”

RATING COMPARISON:

Army PEB – dated 20090819 VA (3 mo. After Separation) – All Effective 20091103
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Varicose Veins, Left Leg 7120 20% Varicose Veins, Left Lower Extremity 7120 10% 20100222
Varicose Veins of Right Leg – Not Rated by PEB Varicose Veins, Right Lower Extremity 7120 10% 20100222
No MEB/PEB Entry for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) 8045 10% 20100204
Syncope Not Unfitting Syncope – Service Connection Denied NSC 20100222
Migraine Headaches Not Unfitting Headaches (claimed as migraine) 8100 10% 20100222
Talus Spur/Right Ankle pain Not Unfitting Right Ankle Pain 5010 0% 20100220
Gout Not Unfitting Gout – Service Connection Denied NSC 20100220
Tinnitus Not Unfitting Tinnitus 6260 10% 20100220
No MEB/PEB Entry for Shoulder Pain Bilateral Shoulder Pain 5010 10% 20100222
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ 0% x 1 20100222
Combined: 20% Combined: 50%

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that Service ratings should have been conferred for other conditions, documented by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA). While the military Disability Evaluation System (DES) considers all of the CI's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those conditions that cut short a service member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of separation. The DVA, however; is empowered to compensate service connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the Veteran’s disability rating should his degree of impairment vary over time.

Varicose Veins. In April 2007, the CI complained of pain and swelling in the left lower extremity (LLE). He was prescribed compression hose and was referred to vascular surgery. Duplex ultrasound on 10 October 2007 found no valvular incompetence at the left saphenofemoral junction. He continued to have pain and swelling of the LLE. A repeat duplex ultrasound in January 2008 revealed an incompetent saphenofemoral junction, with bilateral reflux (left greater than right). The CI underwent bilateral vein stripping on 23 January 2008. Despite the surgery, the CI continued to have pain in both legs with the left being worse than the right. At his June 2009 MEB exam, four and one-half months prior to separation, there were no signs of inflammation or redness. Calf measurements revealed mild swelling of the LLE. The left calf measured 44cm, and the right calf was 42cm. The CI’s chronic varicose vein condition had stabilized as far as pain level and swelling, but it was limiting his day-to-day activities. He was unable to perform in his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), and being on his feet for long periods of time increased the symptoms. As noted above, the PEB found him unfit due to the LLE varicose veins. He was separated on 2 November 2009. At his February 2010 Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, three and one-half months after separation, the CI complained of intermittent swelling of both legs, involving his calves and ankles. He also had pain in both lower legs that improved with walking. Prolonged standing or sitting would cause increased symptoms. He was not using any support hose. Examination revealed varicose veins of both legs. His diagnosis was bilateral varicose veins, left worse than right.

The Board carefully examined all evidentiary information available. The PEB rated the left leg at 20%, for persistent edema and pain. The VA rated each leg at 10%, for a combined varicose vein rating of 20%. From the treatment record, it was clear that the CI had bilateral venous disease, left leg worse than right leg. After due deliberation and consideration of all the evidence, and mindful of the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board determined that the appropriate rating for the varicose vein condition was 20%. It is appropriately coded 7120, and IAW VASRD §4.104, meets criteria for the 20% rating.

Other PEB Conditions. Syncope, migraines, ankle pain, gout and tinnitus were all adjudicated by the PEB as “not unfitting.” None of these conditions were profiled, or implicated in the commander’s statement. All were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no indication from the record that any of these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory performance of MOS duty requirements. All evidence considered there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting reversal of the PEB fitness adjudication for any of the stated conditions.

Other Contended Conditions. The CI asserts that a compensable rating should be considered for traumatic brain injury (TBI). This condition was reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no diagnosis of TBI prior to separation. Careful review of the treatment record reveals insufficient evidence for concluding that this condition interfered with duty performance to a degree that could be argued as unfitting. The Board unanimously agrees that this condition was not unfitting at separation and therefore not subject to Service disability rating.

Remaining Conditions. Several other conditions were also noted in the DES file. None of these conditions were profiled, or implicated in the commander’s statement. All were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no indication from the record that any of these other conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory performance of required military duties. It was determined that none could be argued as unfitting and subject to separation rating. Additionally, certain other conditions were mentioned in the VA rating decision proximal to separation, but not noted in the DES file. The Board does not have the authority to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. The Board, therefore, has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the unfitting varicose vein condition and IAW VASRD §4.104, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the syncope, migraine headaches, right ankle pain, gout, tinnitus, TBI, or any other conditions eligible for consideration; the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Varicose Veins of Lower Extremities 7120 20%
COMBINED 20%

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20100916, w/atchs

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00559

    Original file (PD2009-00559.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no trophic skin changes or evidence of stasis dermatitis.” Diagnosis was “Postphlebitic syndrome, left lower extremity.” The VA (near entry into TDRL) used essentially the same exams and history as the military and rated the CI’s DVT-related conditions as 7121 (Left Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis) at 10%, and 6817 (Bilateral Base Pulmonary Emboli Secondary to Deep Venous Thrombosis) at 60%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00660

    Original file (PD2011-00660.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam (nine months after separation), the physician noted intermittent symptoms of pain and edema in the LLE; although, DVT symptoms were not active at that time. In the matter of the hypercoaguability condition, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00087

    Original file (PD2009-00087.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander attributed the CI’s duty restrictions to his lower back pain (LBP) and leg pain from bilateral varicose veins. Due to prolonged duty restrictions, the CI was referred to the PEB, found unfit and separated at 20% disability for his bilateral varicose veins. The CI's profile was for LBP and varicose veins and listed restrictions that could not be attributed to varicose veins alone.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01176

    Original file (PD-2014-01176.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Repeat examination on 27 June 2004 also recorded that there was no edema of the lower extremities. On examination, the left calf and both thighs were tender to touch, and several distended veins were felt on the left lower calf and right upper thigh.A Coumadin Clinic encounter on 9 December 2005, recorded the CI experienced muscle pain when he overdid activities such as standing too long or playing basketball. The CI complained of edema of the lower extremities relieved with elevation on...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00099

    Original file (PD2010-00099.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was found to have injuries mainly to his legs, more severe on the right than the left leg; however, the left leg still sustained IED injury. The Board determined therefore that neither tinnitus nor the right elbow condition was subject to service disability rating. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01365

    Original file (PD2012 01365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequently after two TDRL periodic exams, the PEB determined the CI’s left lower leg DVT to be stable and unfitting and at this time also determined the CI’s condition to be “post phlebitic syndrome” rated 10%. CI CONTENTION : “Per the findings of my Physical Evaluation Board Proceeding dated 17 Nov 2002, my combined disability rating was rated at 40% category I unfitting conditions. Both the PEBand the VA used the same code:7121, with the PEB rating the condition 10%and the VA rating it...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02239

    Original file (PD-2014-02239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The initial VA C&P examination (within the DES Pilot process occurred)dated3 June 2009, during the examination, the examiner noted that the CI was not currently in psychiatric treatment and during brief treatment for his MH symptoms in 2008 he was not hospitalized, was not suicidal and had not required any psychotropic medications.At the VA C&P examination the CI denied being anxious or depressedand the examiner noted the CI was “without signs of ongoing anxiety, depression, or psychosis at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01024

    Original file (PD2011-01024.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions of history of deep vein thrombosis of the right and left lower extremities with post-phlebetic syndrome and chronic venous insufficiency as requested for consideration are the residuals that, IAW with the VASRD, should be used to rate the unfitting condition of heterozygous factor V Leiden deficiency and therefore they meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and are addressed below, as part of the review of the rating for the unfitting condition. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01188

    Original file (PD2010-01188.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the LLE condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). In the army, I was given migraine headache medications and so I claimed the condition that I actually got treatment for. The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00438

    Original file (PD-2012-00438.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post‐ separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation. The 3 month post‐separation VA (general) C&P examiner did not differentiate the pain and disability of the back condition from that of the extremity condition. The VA rating decision (VARD) relied on the ROM evidence from the 6 month spine exam.