Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00171
Original file (PD2009-00171.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE

CASE NUMBER: PD0900171 COMPONENT: ACTIVE

BOARD DATE: 20090610 SEPARATION DATE: 20070904

________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was an Air Force Capt Health Services Administrator medically separated in 2007 after fourteen years of service, nine of which were enlisted. He was diagnosed with diabetes in June 2006 and was initially treated with oral medication. However, this did not control his blood sugar and he started insulin therapy in early 2007. He developed bilateral cataracts which were felt to be directly related to his diabetes and a sign of more severe disease. He had bilateral cataract surgery with no visual problems afterward. The Air Force Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found him unfit for continued service and he was separated with a 20% disability rating for 7913 Diabetes Mellitus using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force regulations. Using an evaluation done five months after separation from the Air Force, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated his disability at a combined 60%. This included 20% for 7913 Diabetes Mellitus, 30% for 6029 Aphakia (status-post cataract surgery), 10% for 5099-5019 left knee patellofemoral syndrome, 10% for 6260 bilateral tinnitus, and 0% for 7101 Hypertension. The CI contends he deserves a medical retirement since his intentions were to complete a twenty year service to the Air Force.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. After careful consideration of all available information, the Board concluded that the CI’s condition is appropriately rated at 40% under VASRD 7913 Diabetes Mellitus. This rating is based on the severity of the CI’s condition of diabetes mellitus with complications at the time of separation from service. Although his cataracts were a result of his diabetes, he had no unfitting visual condition after his cataract surgery and the Board did not rate his aphakia as an unfitting condition. The CI did require insulin and restricted diet and therefore clearly met the criteria for a 20% rating for 7913 Diabetes Mellitus. He did not require regulation of his activities which is an additional requirement for a 40% rating. However, his history of cataract surgery is a complication that would not be compensable if separately evaluated (because the aphakia is not unfitting) and this is an element of the 60% rating. The Board opined his overall condition and level of disability warranted an evaluation somewhere between the 20% and the 40% rating. The Board decided his overall disability more nearly approximated the criteria for a 40% rating and assigned this rating in accordance with paragraph 4.7 of the VASRD.

Although the CI did not contend that the other conditions rated by the VA should also be rated, the Board examined these conditions and did not find any to be separately unfitting.

________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

Unfitting Condition VASRD Code Rating
Diabetes Mellitus 7913 40%
Combined 40%

________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090217, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veteran's Affairs Treatment Record.

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB

1535 Command Drive, Suite E-302

Andrews AFB, MD 20762-7002

Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Section 1554, 10 USC), PDBR Case Number PD-2009-00171.

After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities. Accordingly, the Board recommended your separation be recharacterized to reflect disability retirement, rather than separation with severance pay.

I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and determined that your records should be corrected accordingly. The office responsible for making the correction will inform you when your records have been changed.

As a result of the aforementioned correction, you are entitled by law to elect coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Upon receipt of this letter, you must contact the Air Force Personnel Center at 1-800-531-7502 to make arrangements to obtain an SBP briefing prior to rendering an election. If a valid election is not received within 30 days from the date of this letter, you will not be enrolled in the SBP program. Unless at the time of your separation, you were married or had an eligible dependent child, in such a case, failure to render an election will result in automatic enrollment.

Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency

Attachment:

Record of Proceedings

cc:

SAF/MRBR

DFAS-IN

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00398

    Original file (PD2009-00398.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    After re-evaluation in August 2007, a third Informal PEB followed by a Formal PEB (Nov 2007) determined the CI should be separated at 20% disability for Type 1 Diabetes using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. The VA also rated the CI’s diabetes at 20% after an evaluation in 2004 and documented out that regulation of activities as defined by the VASRD was not required. There is no evidence that any...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01445

    Original file (PD2012-01445.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated with a 20% disability rating. CI CONTENTION: “The 20% rating does not fit the disability, Type I Diabetes with controlled diet, restricted activities, and insulin dependent starts at the 40% rating. 3 PD1201445 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00089

    Original file (PD2009-00089.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was prohibited from participation in the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) at the time of separation. Therefore, on detailed review, the CI’s condition was appropriately rated by the PEB, consistent with the VA, and IAW VASRD §4.119. The Board unanimously concluded that there are no other medical conditions in this case meriting recommendation as additionally unfitting.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2011-04080

    Original file (bc-2011-04080.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In view of the DVA rating decisions and the severity of her condition, the disability rating awarded by the Air Force should have been higher and she should have been retired by reason of physical disability. 60 percent – Requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities with episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemic reactions requiring one or two hospitalizations per year or twice a month visits to a diabetic care provider, plus complications that would not be compensable if...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00301

    Original file (PD2011-00301.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “After 6.5 years dedicated to the Service of the Air Force (4 at USAFA and 2.5 full-time active), I was determined unfit physically due to the onset of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Unfitting Condition: DM Type I Condition . Therefore, the Board determined that neither condition could be argued as unfitting at the time of separation from Service and subject to separation rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01861

    Original file (PD-2013-01861.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) did not consider the CI’s referred bilateral knee condition (as the original MEB did not forward this condition for PEB adjudication) and only adjudicated the referred diabetes mellitus condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01778

    Original file (PD-2014-01778.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20051012 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01031

    Original file (PD2011-01031.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the 40% rating was not supported by the evidence of the service treatment record, the PEB placed the CI on the TDRL with a rating of 40%. The PEB concluded the diabetes unfitting for continued military service and adjudicated a permanent 20% rating. Both at the time of placement on the TDRL and at the time of permanent disability disposition and removal from the TDRL, the CI’s diabetes was treated with diet and medication (an oral medication and insulin) meeting the VASRD criteria...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00619

    Original file (PD2010-00619.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    A December 11, 2007 Wilford Hall Medical Center cardiology follow up appointment records the CI was asymptomatic and that “he has been physically active with no limitations.” The MEB NARSUM on January 9, 2008 records the CI was feeling well and had no complaint of chest pain, shortness of breath, or light headedness and had no duty restrictions. The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating. I have carefully reviewed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01865

    Original file (PD-2014-01865.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20020207VA -( 99Months Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Diabetes Mellitus791320%Diabetes Mellitus791320%20100722Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 5 Rating: 20%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20100908. The PEB and VA rated the condition at 20% for requiring insulin and restricted diet. DoD Physical Disability Board of Review