RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
SEPARATION DATE: 20020715
NAME:
CASE NUMBER: PD1201445
BOARD DATE: 20121128
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered
individual (CI) was an active duty SSGT/E-6 (8N/Transportation Management
Coordinator), medically separated for Type I diabetes mellitus. With onset in November 2001,
requiring multiple doses of Insulin daily and constant monitoring of blood sugar. Type I
diabetes mellitus condition could not be adequately rehabilitated. The CI did not improve
adequately with treatment and was unable to meet the physical requirements of his Military
Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent
P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Bilateral knees, retropatellar
pain syndrome and right shoulder, tendinitis with impingement syndrome, identified in the
rating chart below, were also identified and forwarded by the MEB. The Informal Physical
Evaluation Board (IPEB) adjudicated the Type I diabetes mellitus condition as unfitting, rated
20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI
appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB) which affirmed the IPEB findings. The USAPDA replied to a
Congressional inquiry following the FPEB, but prior to separation, that the CIs FPEB adjudication
had no error or injustice and affirmed the FPEB determination of 20% versus a requested 40%
rating. The CI was then medically separated with a 20% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “The 20% rating does not fit the disability, Type I Diabetes with controlled
diet, restricted activities, and insulin dependent starts at the 40% rating. My condition fits the
40% to 60% category.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The Type I diabetes mellitus condition
requested for consideration meets the criteria in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview, and is
accordingly addressed below. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application,
or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future
consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service FPEB – Dated 20020326
Condition
Code
7913
Rating
20%
Diabetes Mellitus, Type I
Bilateral Knees w/Pain
Syndrome
Right Shoulder tendinitis
w/impingement
Syndrome
Not Unfitting
Not Unfitting
VA (1 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020716
Condition
Diabetes Mellitus
Left Knee Retropatellar
Syndrome
Right Knee Retropetallar
Syndrome
Right Shoulder Impingement
w/Tendinitis
Code
7913
5260
Rating
40%*
0%**
Exam
20020528
20020528
5260
0%**
20020528
5201-5024
10%
20020528
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Combined: 20%
0% X 1 / Not Service-Connected x 3
Combined: 50%
*BVA Decision 20070905 led to re-rating DM (7913) from 20% to 40% effective day after discharge. **BVA Decision made
knees SC w/0% disability eff 20020420.
ANALYSIS SUMMARY. The FPEB disability description was:
Type I diabetes mellitus, onset Nov 01, requires multiple doses of injectable insulin daily and
constant (4x daily) monitoring of blood sugar. No diabetic complications, has occasional episodes of
hypoglycemia which do not require physicians care (emergency room visits), usually associated with
prolonged arduous physical activity. Able to perform at 7 to 8 METS such as jogging at 12 minute
mile pace for 2 miles and walk 2.5 miles under 30 minutes. Hemoglobin A1c reported at 6.5
indicating good control.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type I Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes CI developed
insulin dependent diabetes requiring hospitalization in November 2001. The service treatment
record (STR) shows his sugars stabilized on long and short acting injectable Insulin given three
to four times a day. His symptoms of blurred vision, polyuria and polydipsia resolved, but he
experienced exercise and delayed meal related hypoglycemia episodes once or twice a week
that required oral glucose, but no formal medical care. He never completed another physical
fitness exam after his diagnosis. Workups showed normal foot and eye exams, no renal or
other end organ damage eight and 5 months prior to separation. CI was compliant with Insulin
therapies and serum glucoses ranged between 82 and 160. At the MEB exam, 5 months prior
to separation, the CI reported he “felt fine” except for symptomatic hypoglycemia with blood
sugars in the 40s and 50s once or twice a week, usually related to delayed meals or exercise.
The MEB physical exam noted no acute abnormalities. A commander’s statement dated 5
months before separation noted that the CI could not deploy due to need for refrigerated
medications, was on a special diet (American Diabetes Association diet/ADA) and could still do
fitness training except in the early morning when his sugars tended to fluctuate (low).
Additionally, he could not do shift work, reported for hospital glucose levels weekly, and was on
the ADA diet and restricted from field rations. He was unable to do most of his MOS except for
administrative work. A second commander’s statement dated 3 months prior to separation
noted all of the above restrictions, but also noted further restricted activities from carrying
loads and pushing equipment due to hypoglycemia episodes. The commander noted that the
CI would have to leave his work area to eat an appropriate diet, take his shots, and could not do
the shift work. He could not work a 24 hour shift due to fatigue or stabilize his hypoglycemia
episodes trending as low as “in the 50’s and 60’s”. The commander stated the CI could no
longer do physical fitness without having hypoglycemia in “1&1/2 miles” and could not work on
the airfield due to “his sugars can drop low before he notices and then goes rapidly and so it
affects him and is unsafe for him…” A permanent P3 profile 3 months prior to separation noted
the CI required “no 24 hour duty due to blood glucose fluctuations. No deployment due to
diabetes, required access to insulin syringes, (refrigerated insulin), monitoring, hospital care as
needed. No assignment to units requiring ongoing consumption of field rations, requires ADA
prescribed diet.” The only aerobic conditioning exercise permitted was “Walk at own pace and
2 PD1201445
distance,” but the CI was permitted to do the physical fitness test walk (but not run) and could
also march up to 2 miles. The profile was signed by two physicians. Under block 9, OTHER the
profile stated “MEB initiated. Prolonged, heavy exertion only as tolerated. No prolonged
extreme exertion.” At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, 6 weeks prior to
separation the CI reported “a multitude of hypoglycemic reactions,” and the use of three types
of Insulin, but no diabetic peripheral neuropathy, renal disease or vascular problems.” His
physical exam showed a weight of 145 pounds, reportedly down from 160 a year before, a
near-normal Hemoglobin A1C at 6.5 (4-6) and otherwise normal physical exam except for minor
musculoskeletal findings outside this scope. Post-separation VA records, including the Board of
Veterans Appeals (BVA) decision dated September 5, 2007 demonstrated the CI had continued
hypoglycemic episodes with activity and went on to develop hypoglycemic seizures with work
and driving restrictions. The CI’s symptoms came under better control when the CI was begun
on an insulin pump in 2005 and symptomatic episodes and work restrictions decreased after
2005.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
FPEB and the VA chose the same VASRD code 7913 for adjudicating diabetes mellitus. The
Board found no evidence of episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemic reactions requiring one
or two hospitalizations per year at the time of separation or documented diabetic
complications that would not be compensable if separately evaluated. Although the CI was
documented to “visit the hospital” once a week for glucose monitoring, this was outpatient
laboratory testing and not emergency department or inpatient treatment. The CI was clearly
on insulin and a restricted diet. The deliberation of this case focused on whether the CI met the
VASRD criteria for “regulation of activities” for a 40% rating rather than a 20% rating. The
VASRD definition of regulation of activities (avoidance of strenuous occupational and
recreational activities), requires physician-prescribed restriction per VA policy and legal
precedence. The Board deliberated if the profile restrictions and multiple hypoglycemic
reactions related to exercise or activity (not requiring medical treatment) rose to the level to
more closely approximate the 40% rating level. There was no exercise tolerance test in
evidence and the FPEB described ability “to perform at 7 to 8 METS” was adjudged to be an
approximation most likely based on the CI’s fitness testing performance. The overall picture of
the CI’s DM proximate to separation was of good glucose control, with a “brittle” type of
picture with hypoglycemic episodes when activities were prolonged, heavy, or unscheduled.
The Board found the physician-signed profile restrictions, restriction from early morning fitness
training, multiple doses of insulin for control and noted hypoglycemic events did constitute
regulation of activities and the CI’s disability picture at the time of separation more nearly
approximated the disability picture of the 40% rating criteria. After due deliberation,
considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board
recommends a disability rating of 40% for the diabetes mellitus condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised. In the matter of the diabetes mellitus, Type I condition, the Board unanimously
recommends a disability rating of 40% coded 7913 IAW VASRD §4.119. There were no other
conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
3 PD1201445
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as
follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent
disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
7913
COMBINED
40%
40%
Diabetes Mellitus, Type I
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20020713, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
4 PD1201445
a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the
b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed
recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR)
pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s
separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 40%
effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance
pay.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected
accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:
individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the
original medical separation for disability with severance pay.
effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.
c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will
account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 40%
effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.
medical TRICARE retiree options.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and
to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and
5 PD1201445
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00783
The PEB and VA both rated the diabetes condition under VASRD code 7913, diabetes mellitus, but at different ratings. There was no evidence in the service treatment records that indicated medical restriction of normal activities including athletic was required. The PEB and VA both rated the condition 0% code 6200, chronic right mastoiditis.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01116
The CI was then medically separated with a 20% disability rating. The two interim TDRL exams and PEB decisions were not in evidence for review and therefore the Board could not discern the reasoning for continuance on TDRL, but agreed if the recommendation was to remain on TDRL, the % criteria that allowed this was the 40% rating. In addition, the VA, in spite of the 13 February 2008 exam, did not rate diabetic neuropathy until a rating decision in 2010 with an effective date of 30...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02326
He denied hospitalization for diabetes or diabetic complications and had a full-time job.At a C&P exam on 13 June 2007(14 months after TDRL placement) the CI reported that if “he runs or does any type of activities he will have hypoglycemia.” He therefore restricted his activities. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Both at the time of placement on the TDRL and at the time of permanent disability disposition and removal from the TDRL, the...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00736
I have to take shots 4 times a day, strenuous activities cause me to have periods of hypoglycemia at work and during various activities outside of work. The PEB rated the CI’s Type 1 DM, requiring Insulin and restricted diet coded 7913 DM at 20%. The CI contended that he requires regulation of activity in order to control his DM.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00301
CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “After 6.5 years dedicated to the Service of the Air Force (4 at USAFA and 2.5 full-time active), I was determined unfit physically due to the onset of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Unfitting Condition: DM Type I Condition . Therefore, the Board determined that neither condition could be argued as unfitting at the time of separation from Service and subject to separation rating.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00376
With initiation of insulin treatment, the CI's blood sugar levels were 90's to 160's with no episodes of hypoglycemia, as per medical record documentation immediately prior to placement on TDRL. The Board also considered the condition of Bilateral Lower Extremity Peripheral Neuropathy at the CI’s request. When determining the final and permanent disability rating, the Board must evaluate the CI’s condition at the time of separation from the TDRL in 2008.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01861
No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) did not consider the CI’s referred bilateral knee condition (as the original MEB did not forward this condition for PEB adjudication) and only adjudicated the referred diabetes mellitus condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01466
SEPARATION DATE: 20090426 The CI was still taking oral medications only (no injected insulin) and had undergone surgery in March 2008 (Abdominoplasty) with continued high blood sugar levels (glucose 262 with normal 74-106) and high Glycosolated hemoglobin levels (A1C 9.5 with normal 4.2-7.0). I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01132
Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. It is appropriately coded 7913, and IAW VASRD §4.119, meets criteria for the 60% rating level due to requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities; with an episode of ketoacidosis, which required hospitalization, plus complications that would not be compensable if separately evaluated. In the CI’s treatment record, there was not sufficient...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02244
IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20091009VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Diabetes Mellitus, Type I791320%Diabetes Mellitus, Type I791320%**STROther x 1 (Not in Scope)Other x 0STR Combined: 20%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100226 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). The...