RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: navy
CASE NUMBER: pd09000114 COMPONENT: active
BOARD DATE: 20090611 SEPARATION DATE: 20080205
________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was a regular Navy Senior Chief Petty Officer medically separated from the Navy in 2008 after 16 ½ years of service. The medical basis for the separation was a seizure disorder. CI had two generalized seizures (major) and multiple simple partial seizures (minor). His first major seizure was likely in April 04 when he lost consciousness while driving. His second (last) major seizure was on 24 Jun 06. CI had an abnormal EEG with normal extended videotaped sleep EEG, CT and MRI. He was placed on oral medication that completely controlled his seizures. CI was returned to full duty off of limited duty (LIMDU) by a non-USN provider, without an MEB. When CI’s assignment changed, they noted an MEB was missed and CI met an MEB with NARSUM dated 20070915 and a recommendation to be found fit and returned to duty. The PEB found CI unfit at 20%. CI asked for reconsideration and appealed to a formal PEB and the BCNR. All appeals concurred with a final determination of unfit and separation at 20% for seizures. The BCNR (ruling of 15 Jan 2009) opined that were the CI’s seizures not yet controlled on medication, CI would have been placed on TDRL and re-evaluated with the same final outcome of 20% rating. The VA 40% rating was based on a similar 20% rating for seizures and added 10% each for irritable bowel syndrome, left wrist tendonitis and a hernia repair scar; none of which approached the level of being determined to be unfitting. The CI contends that PEB gave 20% for epilepsy, since MEB/PEB was not conducted in a timely manner, which would have rated him as 40% for seizures. The BCNR ruled that even if CI were placed on temporary duty retirement list (TDRL) at the time of his second major seizure, he was controlled on medication and the 20% rating was correct. VA gave 40% rating. CI discussed LIMDU, release to full duty, yrs of exemplary service, deployments, combat, career, and circumstances in contending for a 40% rating similar to the VA rating.
________________________________________________________________
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board considered that only seizures met the threshold for consideration as unfitting.
The seizure types, timing and characterization as major or minor were clearly agreed upon by the USN, VA and the CI. There was no indication that the CI’s nocturnal seizure was discounted by the USN IAW prior SECNAVINST 1850.4E, section (8) (e). The CI’s first major seizure was April 04 and his second seizure was over 2 years later (20060624). CI stated, and the Board accepted, that the CI had 2-3 minor seizures every 2 weeks until Jun 06. Major and minor seizures are considered together in the VASRD and rating is based on the type (major or minor), frequency, and currency of the seizure(s). The Board did not believe that it was likely that CI had more frequent minor seizures than he contended or that he had more frequent major seizures than contended. CI’s seizures did not reach the next rating level (40%) which required a major seizure within 6 months or 2 in last 1 year; or averaging 5 to 8 minor seizures weekly. The Board accepted the BCNR’s rationale that had the CI’s seizures not been well controlled at any earlier dated PEB, the CI would not have received a higher permanent rating, but either placed on TDRL or continued on duty until stabilization of his condition on medication. CI clearly stabilized and remained seizure-free on medication.
The Board determined that since the CI was stable and seizure-free on medications, the original PEB 20% rating (8914 Epilepsy, psychomotor) was correct. Alternately rating the CI under code 8910, as the VA used, applies the same General Rating Formula for Major and Minor Epileptic Seizures and does not benefit the CI.
________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s separation.
________________________________________________________________
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090202, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veteran's Affairs Treatment Record.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00278
The PEB found the seizure disorder to be unfitting, code 8910, and recommended separation from the TDRL with a 10% permanent rating. Seizure disorder891040%10% COMBINED40%10% ______________________________________________________________________________ I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr. XXXXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00712
The medical record documents three major seizures in the first year of diagnosis, in November 2002, March 2003, and July 2003. VA treatment report on 20 November 2008, also stated last the major seizure was March 2008. The FPEB noted that the CI had another seizure in March 2008.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01909
The seizure condition, characterized as “PCS (partial complex seizures) with secondary generalization,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 with no other conditions submitted by the MEB.ThePEB adjudicated “partial complex seizure disorder with secondary generalization,” rated 40%,citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and placed the CI on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) effective on 13 December 1998 to allow the...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00633
I recommend that this officer be released from his service obligation via a medical discharge.’ On 20040316 the CI’s case met a LIMITED DUTY BOARD which determined the CI be placed on an 8 month Limited Duty Board during which time a workup will be undertaken for his seizure disorder. After careful consideration of all available information the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s seizure disorder is appropriately rated as 8910 Primary Generalized Seizure Disorder at 10% disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01257
A Depakote level of 14 at the time of his September 2002 seizure indicated some element of noncompliance. At the time of the NARSUM, the CI reported compliance with his medication and his neurologic examination was normal. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CIs disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Epilepsy 8911 10% COMBINED 10% The following documentary evidence was...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00267
The Board noted no mental health (MH) conditions were referred to the MEB or PEB for adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a determination of unfit for a mental health condition; and, therefore, no additional disability ratings can be recommended. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130016483 (PD201300267)I have...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01335
He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The epilepsy condition, characterized as partial onset epilepsy with secondary generalization was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 as medically unacceptable.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated partial onset epilepsy with secondary generalization as unfitting and rated 20% with application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00622
VASRD criteria for rating epilepsy are based on the frequency of major or minor seizures. At the time of the October 31, 2005 Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination, approximately six months before TDRL reevaluation in 2006, the CI reported experiencing four seizures: one seizure in April 2004, May 2004, October 20, 2004, and in early January 2005, with no seizures between January 2005 and the VA C&P examination. The Board must determine the most appropriate fit with VASRD §4.124a...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00140
The MEB forwarded epilepsy with breakthrough seizures on therapeutic levels of medications as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. In the matter of the seizure disorder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 8910 IAW VASRD §4.124. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00114
Since the injury he suffered from headaches and one isolated seizure in October 2004. The Board considered at length both the TDRL rating and the final rating recommendations at separation from the TDRL. The VASRD does allow for a 10% rating for the cranial defect and the Board, by simple majority, recommends addition of this condition as unfitting, coded 5296, with a 10% TDRL rating and a 10% final rating.