Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00104
Original file (FD-2015-00104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAMt OF SERVICE MEMBER (LA T, FIRSl' MIDDLE INITIAL)
(b)(6)
GRADE
TYPE GEN I     PERSONAL APPEARA CE x    I        RECORD REVIEW
COl.'NSEL NA!I E or COll:O.SEL ""' DOR ORCA. IZUIOS ADORE A'. D OR ORCA. 7.ATI0:-0 OFCOIJ);SEL
YES No
x

MEMBER SITTING
VOTE OFTHE BOARD
llON Gr:N UOTllC OTHER DENY
(b)(6) x
x
x
x
x
ISSUES   AOl.01 INUt..X NUJ\18tK
A67.30
A52.00
EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO TH£ BOARD
l ORDl:.R APPOIN I ING Tlll:. BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TOTHE BOARD
ADDITION AL EXlllBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERS01'ALAPPEARANCE
TAPE RECORD!'G OF PERSO AL APPl:ARANCE HEARING
llCARJ>rC DATE

09 Jul 2015
CASE NllBlR

FD-2015-00104
APl'l.ICANf'SISSl;'EAN01Ht llO'JW Dl:CISkJNAI. RAllQ!\Al.t;ARt.DfSCUSSED CNTHEAITAO!EDAIR fORCE OOCHM<.o• R1'.Vlt"' l:IOAIW tlt:l;.l)IOl'>AI. AATIONALE.
Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/withou t counsel, and the right to subm it an application to the AFBCMR.









(b)(6)   --
--
TO:
SAF/MRBR
SSO C STREEl' WE T, UITE 40 RANDOLPll AFB, TX 78150-4742
fROI:
tCIU'TARV or Tiit. AIR f"OR PERO.SS-EL COUCIL
AIR t'ORCE DISCHARGE RE\ 1£\\ BOARD 1$.lS COl\IA.'10 DR.££ V. INC. JRO FU>OR A. DRt\\'S AFB, MD 20767001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00   (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE :-.L'\IBER

FD-2015-00104

GEN ERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the reason for the discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contai ns available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDI NG: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and to change of reason for the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant recei ved a General discha rge for Com mission of Serious Offense- Sexual Perversion

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under i ts responsi bility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge i f such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the cond uct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credibl e evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pert inent standards of equity and propriety. The applican t's record of service included a Special Court Martial conviction for wrongfu lly engaging in sexual contact wi th an Airman wi thout her permission.

The member contends that his discharge was inequi table because i t was based on one incident that happened in his 9 years of service. The applicant stated that he would have fought the discharge action but decided to go ahead with the volunteer separation because he would have been separated under the Air Force roll back program anyway. The member's discharge was legall y sufficient per AFI 36-3208 para 5.52. 1, i t states
''Airmen are subject to discharge for misconduct based on acts of aberrant sexual behavior or acts of sexual misconduct.'' The OR B also found that the negati ve aspects of the willful miscond uct outweighed the
positive aspects of the appl icant's performa nce and concluded that the discharge was appropriate.

A discharge is upgraded only i f the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequi ty or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the records, the Board found no evidence to warrant an upgrade of the discharge characteri zation.

CONCLUSION: The Di charge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent wi th the proced ural and substant ive requirements of the d ischarge regulation , was within t he discretion of the d ischarge authority, and that the appl icant was provided fu l l administrative due process.

I n view of the foregoing find ings, the Board further concl udes that there exists no legal or equ itable basis for upgrade of discharge and determi nes the discharge should remai n unchanged.

Attach ment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00171

    Original file (FD-2014-00171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedon the availableservice record. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00018

    Original file (FD-2015-00018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoIlonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains available pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thed ischarge.ISSU E:The applicantreceiveda General dischargeforMisconduct Minor Disciplinary Infractions The...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00432

    Original file (FD-2014-00432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theappl icant appealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheappl icant andthefactorsleadingto the discharge. FINDING: The Board deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00634

    Original file (FD-2014-00634.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsava ilablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00750

    Original file (FD-2014-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandachangeofreasontothenarrative.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl ined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe available servicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinent data ontheappl icant and thefactors lead ing tothe discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and autho1ity for discharge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00019

    Original file (FD-2015-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable;achangetothenarrativereasonandachangetothereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors lead ingto the discharge. FINDJNG: TheBoarddenies theupgradeof the discharge;reasonandauthorityfor discharge andchangeofreenlistmentcode. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00101

    Original file (FD-2014-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00101

    Original file (FD 2014 00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00560

    Original file (FD-2014-00560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRS)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefconta insavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse