Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00171
Original file (FD-2014-00171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE i\' EMBER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLEINITIA L)     GRADE    AFSN/SSAN
(b)(6)   (b)(6)
TYPE GEN         I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REV IEW
COUNSEL  NAm;Of COUNSEi. ANO OR ORCA. 17.ATION    AOORESSANO OR ORCANIZ..\ TION Of COUNSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OF THE BOA RD
MEMBER SITTING   llON     OEN      UOTllC'  OTl lER  DENY
(b)(6)   #        x
x        #
#        x
#        x
x        #
ISSUt A94.05   INOt:\ LMHER     A67.30   EX HIBITS SU }MITTEO TO Tut;60AIW
I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR RE\'IE\V OF DISCllARGE
I.ETTER OF NOTIFl('A'lION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FlLE COUNSEL'S REI.EASE TO THE 130ARD
ADD ITIONAL EXIIIBITS SUl3MITTED AT TIME OF Pl'RSONAL A l'Pl'ARANCE
TA PE RECORDING OF PERSONAL A PPEARANCE IIEAR IN(j

11 1-:A RING O\TE         C,\SI:Nnmrn

07 Jlln 2015     FD-20 14-00171
APPLICAN1..SISStrF . NO THE BOARD"> OECIS ONAL RATIONALE ARE IJlCtll>SLL> °"' rtl AlTAC 111) AIK f{)RC-0 OISCllAR{a3Kev11,;w 60ARI) DEt'ISI01'AL RM IQ:'MLl:.
Case heard in Wash i ngton . O.C'.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance wi th/without counsel, and the right to submit an appl ication to the A FBCMR.




# 1 ati-ati vc change



(b)(6)

INOORSEMENT      OATE: 1/1612015
TO:      FROM:
SAF/MRBR         SECRE.1.AR\ OJ". Tii i:: \IR FORtl:: Pl;USONNJ l.. COl' 'Cll
AIR t'QRCE OISCllA RGE RE\'I [\\ BOARD
550 C STREET WEST,SlJITF -10     1$.l$ C'OMl\lANO OR, EF: \\ INC. JRO Fl.OOR
R/\NDOLPI IA Fl3. TX 78150·4742    ANl>Rf.11 S Af'll, II) 20762·700 1


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (E F-V2)         Previous



A IR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONA L RAT IONALE
CASE "U;\IBER

FD-2014-00171

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FIN DI NG: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Miscond uct - Commission of a serious offense.

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibili ty to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. I n reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affa i rs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicanf s record of service incl uded one A11icle 1 5 for control of a POV while intoxicated and one Letter of Reprimand for being an-ested by civi l ian authorities for driving whi le intoxicated.

Issue I . The appl icant contends that the discharge was based on an isolated incident over 9 years, 11 months of service. He also claims that his misconduct was a resu lt of alcohol dependence. The DRB recognized the fact that the applicant had served for almost 10 years prior to the discharge being initiated, but concluded the applicanf s miscond uct outwei ghed the positive aspects of his time i n the Air Force. The Board noted the applican t was entitled to request an administrative discharge board, but waived his right to do so. They found the seriousness of the misconduct offset the positi ve aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the characteriza tion of discharge was appropriate. I lowever, u pon review of the records, the DRS did consider the diagnosis of alcohol dependence a basis for a change to the narrative reason for discharge.

Issue 2. The appl icant cited his desire to recei ve the G.l. Bill benefi ts as justification for upgrade. The DRS noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on March 27, 2003) t hat he u nderstood he must receive an Honorable discharge to recei ve future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact from the loss of these benefits to the applicant however, this is not a matter of inequi ty or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedura l and substanti ve requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority. and that the applicant was provided full administrat ive due process.

I n view of the foregoi ng find ings, the Board concludes that the characterization for discharge is appropiiate however , the reason for discharge is more accurately descri bed as Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Title I 0, USC 1 553.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00101

    Original file (FD-2014-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00101

    Original file (FD 2014 00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00634

    Original file (FD-2014-00634.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsava ilablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00214

    Original file (FD 2014 00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00214

    Original file (FD-2014-00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00719

    Original file (FD-2013-00719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof discharge toHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined and requeststhatthe review becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors leadingtothe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceiveda BadConductDischargeviaSpecialCourtMartial.The AirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilitytoexaminetheproprietyand equi...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00018

    Original file (FD-2015-00018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoIlonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains available pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thed ischarge.ISSU E:The applicantreceiveda General dischargeforMisconduct Minor Disciplinary Infractions The...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00310

    Original file (FD-2014-00310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof dischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservice record. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00426

    Original file (FD-2014-00426.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepe1tinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorsleading tothe discharge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE:TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilityto...