Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00463
Original file (FD-2014-00463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAM£ OF SERVICE MEMBER (lAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)       CRADE
(b) (6)
TYPE GEN        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE      x        I        RECORD REVJEW
COUNSEL  NAME OF COUNSEi.. AND OR ORCANIZATION    ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATION OFCOUNSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OFTHE BOARD
MEMBER SITIINHON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x
x x x x
ISSUES   A94.S3   INDEX N\IMBER    A67.10   EXHIBITS SUBMlTIED TO THE BOARD
ORDER APPOINTING T BOARD       
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING Of PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARCNG

HEARJNC OATE     CASE NUMBER

27 May 2015      FD-2014-00463
APPl.JCANrS ISSUE AND 111E BOl\JlD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE AU DISCUSSED ON l1iE A1TAOiED AlR FORCt! DLSCHAROE R.eVmW BQARD DECISIONAL &ATIONALE.

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.







(b) (6)

(b) (6)



U'llJU.10.f. :!.wl'     DATE: 5129(2015
TO:      FROM:
SECRETARY Of TIIE Al R FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE RE\1EW BOARD

550 CSTREET WEST, SUITE 40
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING,3R.D Fl.OOR

RANDOLPH AFB,TX 78150-4742       ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUi\IBER

FD-2014-00463

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief conta ins available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors lead ing to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge is denied .

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesti ng the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under i ts responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for.discharge if such change is wan-anted. In reviewi ng discharges, the Board presumes regulari ty in the conduct of governmenta l affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumpt ion, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. ln order to adhere to Mental Health Amendments to I 0 USC 1553, a physician with specialized trai ning on men tal hea l th disorders was present for this board. The applicant 's record of service i ncluded two A rticle l 5s, one Letter of Reprimand, and one Letter of Counseling, and a vacation of suspended non­ jud icial pu nish ment. Her misconduct i ncl uded fail ing to go to duty on time (2x), and maki ng a false officia l statement with the intent to deceive (2x).

The applicant stated in her application that she graduated with her Bachelor's Degree i n 2004 wi th a dual major in Social work and Psychology. She then recei ved a Master 's Degree in Science of Social Work i n 2005. She added that she is a producti ve member of her communi ty, and has worked with chi ldren with special need s for many years. The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has overcome her difficult past. However, no i nequ i ty or im propriety i n her discharge was suggested or found in the course of the heari ng. The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropria tel y characterized her term of service. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record , the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization or reason for the discharge.

CONCLUS ION : The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedura l and substantive req uirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applican t was provided full administrati ve due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and detennines the discharge shou ld remain unchanged.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00214

    Original file (FD 2014 00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00214

    Original file (FD-2014-00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00750

    Original file (FD-2014-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandachangeofreasontothenarrative.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl ined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe available servicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinent data ontheappl icant and thefactors lead ing tothe discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and autho1ity for discharge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00115

    Original file (FD-2015-00115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GE ERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefconta insavailable pertinentdata ontheapplicant andthefactorsleading to the discharge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrderThe AirForceDischargeReview...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00155

    Original file (FD-2014-00155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorableandchangeofauthorityfordischarge,andchange ofreenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservice record. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorslead ing tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00095

    Original file (FD-2013-00095.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedb1ief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddenies theupgradeof thedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00719

    Original file (FD-2013-00719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof discharge toHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined and requeststhatthe review becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors leadingtothe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceiveda BadConductDischargeviaSpecialCourtMartial.The AirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilitytoexaminetheproprietyand equi...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00758

    Original file (FD-2014-00758.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD IIEARJ NGRECORD'IA;\lEOFSERVICE'lt:'•lllEn (L,\ST,tlllSr;\llDDLE INITlr\L) (;Jt,\Ot: ,\fN/SSAN(b) (6) (b) (6) TYPE GEN I l'ER!SO 'ALAPPEARANCE x I Rt..COROHEVlt..W C:O SU. '\\IIore()\"f I "I)ORORC "I/TIO\ IODRr\\ "DORORG "l/\110\Ot(01 "rt HS '• x\ \IE\IBERSITTI G llON GFN LO11K' OTllER DEN\ (b)(6) x i-xi-i- ISSlI'S A94.05 l\Of\ '-1\IOtR A67.10 t.XlllKII s SIJn"nTt:O TOTll £BOARD I ORDl R Al'POIN rINGI Ill·BOARD \PPI I('A110\JIORRI \IIW OF DISC'llARGE l11I fR 01...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00560

    Original file (FD-2014-00560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRS)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefconta insavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00634

    Original file (FD-2014-00634.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsava ilablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...