Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00034
Original file (FD-2009-00034.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE

 
  

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

  
 

AFSN/SSAN

 

 

 

 

] PERSONAL APPEARANCE ~ TX RECORD REVIEW

 

 

    
 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

cgibtreba age

OTHER DENY

 
 

 

 

VOTH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ar corre

| gh XHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE, BOARD »
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEI’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE IIEARING

 

INDEX NUMBER

 

A67.10

A01.00

 

 

 

ae iN le

 

 

 

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

 

 

 

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an

   

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL

SAF/MRBR

te say AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1436 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00034

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and

after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.

ISSUE:

Issue 1. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of her discharge. The record
indicates the applicant received two Article 15s, a Letter of Reprimand, and a Record of Individual
Counseling for misconduct. Her misconduct included failure of fitness test (2x), signing a false official
statement, failure to report for duty, failure to pay debt, failure to go, and wrongfully appropriated a
providers stamp and signed a false official statement with the intent to deceive. The Board opined that
through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her behavior. They
found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty
performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to
warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

Issue 2. The applicant cited her desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB
noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, she understood she must receive an Honorable
discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of
these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would
warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00025

    Original file (FD-2009-00025.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his/her discharge. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00463

    Original file (FD-2008-00463.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    / NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL “ NOTHOPTHEBOARD) = HON GEN UOTHC OTHER x¥+ Met xA+ e+ Xt ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a EXTUBIT SSUBMITTED tO "TE (RD me A93.11 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00375

    Original file (FD-2010-00375.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW ' NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER DENY ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A47.00 ee ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00188

    Original file (FD-2009-00188.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    VOTE OF THE BOARD iis MEMBER SITTING | HON | GEN UOTHC OTHER | DENY x x x xX - T x 2 5, se * r NAT a TEES Te rary LT ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.00 oo : EXTIEBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ds A92,21 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ; 4 |BRIRF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD | ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PFRSONAL APPEARANCE ‘TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE : CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00065

    Original file (FD-2009-00065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code hears REE TO: a : #8 ee ae ie a SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 INDORSE ME Doe persmany FROM: ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR, REVIEW OF DISCHARGE de | OE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00050

    Original file (FD-2009-00050.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW Pee 7 .| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Ee OTHER DENY MEMBER SITTING ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 [eee «EX 11Bl Ss 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOVIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00020

    Original file (FD-2009-00020.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW AFSN/SSAN : COUNSEL ‘| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ISSUES A93.23 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 Lanes rene UBMEET, BOARD A92,35 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A93.09 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE ne 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00183

    Original file (FD2008-00183.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW :| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No xX MEMBER SITTING . The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2007-00424_Redacted

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN a AMN pe TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING UOTHC OTHER DENY ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00271

    Original file (FD-2010-00271.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record indicates the applicant received a two Article 15s and a Letter of Reprimand. The Board concluded that the seriousness of the applicant’s willful misconduct outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board was