AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
AFSN/SSAN
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x | RECORD REVIEW
: CO! / NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
“ NOTHOPTHEBOARD) =
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER
x¥+
Met
xA+
e+
Xt
ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a EXTUBIT SSUBMITTED tO "TE (RD me
A93.11 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _
A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
27 May 2010 FD-2008-00463
2 APPEICANY’S ISSUE ANDTHE BOARDS DECISIONS IONATE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHAR
ee ' sania a / os ; oe
ue
oe
Case heard in Washington, D.C,
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
*Reason and Authority
+Reenlistment Code
|
& p
upg on Semen eum cat nya PAL Mar ts : 4 Ce o : ee " os ony ee ‘ 4
TO: FROM:
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SAF/MRBR se uuseee AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00463
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge,
and change of reenlistment code.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUES:
Issue 1. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant
does submit that he was having financial difficulties and has since paid his bills. He has expressed a desire
to have his discharge upgraded so that he may be eligible to reenlist into the United States Air Force
Reserve. The record indicates the applicant received five Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling
and two Records of Individual Counseling. His misconduct included failure to pay for a video game and
repeatedly lied to his supervisor, wrote an insufficient funds check, failure to go (3x), neglected his daughter
by failing to take her for medical appointments, making a false official statement, and failure to complete
UPRG audit. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample
opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any
positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no
evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
Issue 2. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.1. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. ‘The DRB
noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he understood he must receive an Honorable
discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of
these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would
warrant an upgrade.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00086
SSS ° - VOTE OF THE BOARD Te MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTUER DENY x x x x x ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A67.30 oS | EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD foe 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00356
| j | # A92.21 ~ i i710 See a oe A92.01 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 \BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 12 Jul 2012 FD-2010-00356 - Pea eISS ‘Case heard in Washington, D.C. FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change of reason and authority for...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00463_13
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINJ11AL)GRADEPERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGHON GENUOTHCOTHERxxA67.10 A93.0l 1ORDERAPPOCNTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF · PERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEAJllNGDATE CASENUMBER17Oct2013...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00262
i | Poof GEE J x i ee ee poo oG oF bE dG | i oy | | i of 4 | i ; ; i i ee ee | i 4 “ ee | HE | Poy od | rf - Po bod ot dg | ISSUES ‘493.19 INDEX NUMBER rn 67.10 oe a a is f A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A93.01 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 29 Mar 2012...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00025
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his/her discharge. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00059
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE AIC X | RECORD REVIEW TYPE GEN ae | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL hn UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x x x ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER AG67.10 oe oS ETS SUBMI 1 {ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE [COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00001
ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A84.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A94,55 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL VILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 17 Dec 2009 FD-2009-00001 APPLICANT'S ISSUE-AND THE:BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE:ATTACHED AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW:...
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00281
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00092
” VOTE OF THE BOARD a HON GEN UOTHC OTHER [ DENY xX x x x x ISSUES 4.94.95 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 BS Oo CEXETBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD oe LI JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD __ _ 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_ [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION _ 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 24 Jun 2010 FD-2009-00092 APPL! FINDING: The Board denies the...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00587
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (1.AST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN —— AB po TYPE GEN | [ PERSONAL APPEARANCE _ X | RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND: OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN UOTHC “OTHER DENY MEMBER SITTING x x —--—— ct mn ia A93.01 INDEXNUMBER = AB TSO Si aun A94.05 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD Oe te 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S...