AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
a AMN pe
TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
UOTHC OTHER DENY
ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.00
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
1
[2
3
4
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
30 Jun 2009 FD-2007-00424
ae
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
a
SIGNAAURE OF RECORDER 7 ff of ff yf SIGNATURE, OF BOARD PRESIDENT
RSEM)
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2007-00424
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He admits that he made
mistakes and has expressed a desire to have his discharge upgraded to better his financial situation as a
single parent. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and four Letters of Reprimand for
misconduct. His misconduct consisted of failure to obey a no-contact order, negligently placing his eight
month old child in danger by leaving it unattended for approximately 30-40 minutes, made a false official
statement, underage drinking, speeding, failure to go (twice), failure to adhere to dress and appearance
standards and failure to follow rules and regulations. The DRB opined that through these administrative
actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded that
the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air
Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
Issue 2. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB
noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he understood he must receive an Honorable
discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of
these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would
warrant an upgrade.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00441
FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change the reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Additionally, applicant contends that the he was immature at the time of discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00028
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL : : : AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE- FD-2009-00028 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. After a...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00137
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Applicant appeals for an upgrade so that he can further his education. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00149
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X | RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL OTHER DENY x x xX x x | ISSUES A931 I INDEX NUMBER A67.90 E ! The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00465
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN a ‘ x PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW 0 NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL nes [we Px] | Donte Marshal, Inc 00 HON : UOTHC OTHER DENY ISSUES A92.21 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 . | A94,05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE (3. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00150
ou NDORSEMENT SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the nght to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, IRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (FF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00150 GENERAL: The applicant...
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00183
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW :| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No xX MEMBER SITTING . The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00755
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDBEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVIEADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUl'l'SU.MEMBERSIITINGHONGENUOTHCOTHERDENYxxxxxISSUESA94.53INDEXNIJMB[RA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER17Apr2014...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00459_13
GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereason andauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:Upgradeofthedischarge,changeofreasonandauthorityfordischarge,andchangeofreenlistmentcodearedenied.
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00072
GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE:The applicant receivedaGeneral discharge forMisconduct -Minor DisciplinaryInfractionsTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underits...