Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00383
Original file (FD-2008-00383.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 
     

 

 

  
 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

As pe
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW
ca GOUNSE iat NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION — ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL.

     

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  

 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
x
x
x
|
x
xX
ISSUES A94.53 “INDEX NUMMER A67.50 EN TR LEsSUB Vil EL oa or
1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2. | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMEQF ”
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
20 Aug 2009 FD-2008-00383

 
   

GEATIONALE ARE

hte

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

 

 

 

SATF/MRBR ‘ SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL.
ve ae wre AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1435 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, IX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00383

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propricty of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.

The record indicates the applicant received corrective action:
Two (2) Article 15s for 1) assault--specifically striking a local national at a bar and a specialist executing
military police duties, drunk and disorderly conduct bringing discredit upon the armed forces—
specifically yelling obscenities toward military police in performance of their duties, urinating in public,
damaging property by pulling on/striking/kicking inside of local taxi cab, and communicating a threat;
and 2) wrongfully use with intent to deceive another’s military identification card to gain entry into an
over 2] establishment

ISSUES:

Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his/her discharge. The applicant does
submit that he has matured over the years and would like to return to school to make a better life for his two
children. Although the Board considers all aspects of an applicant’s service and post-service conduct, these
alone cannot be the basis for an upgrade to the characterization. An inequity or impropriety must be evident
in the administrative actions taken at the time of discharge. After thorough review of the record, The Board
found the severity of the misconduct warranted a GENERAL discharge characterization in accordance with
Air Force policies and the conduct expected of all Airmen. The Board concluded that the discharge was
appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due proccss.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00155

    Original file (FD2008-00155.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Pl AB a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ‘VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY x x x xX xX _ EXHIBITS SUBMITTED:TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00090

    Original file (FD-2009-00090.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ABSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW b : NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING GEN | UoTHC | OTHER | DENY x ISSUES A01.00 INDEX NUMBER A67,30 a ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION oo" EAMBITS SUBMITTED T 1 2 3 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00278

    Original file (FD2008-00278.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 X — Upgrade, Reason for Discharge, Reenlistment Code Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request. FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change reason for discharge and change of the reenlistment code are denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00348

    Original file (FD-2010-00348.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00097

    Original file (FD-2009-00097.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN SRA a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW Ree NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ESET VOTE OF THE BOARD. a

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00597

    Original file (FD-2008-00597.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ee 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 19 Feb 2010 FD-2008-00597 SSSUE AND a cae Case heard i in Washington, D.C, FORGE PGES. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00702

    Original file (FD-2014-00702.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable,tochangethe reason andauthorityforthedischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge,thechangeofreasonand authority...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00376

    Original file (FD-2010-00376.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00240

    Original file (FD2008-00240.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 29 Jun 2009 FD-2008-00240 Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the AFBCMR. FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or...