AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02477
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Home of Record reflect Beckley, WV, rather than Surfside, SC.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The HOR section on his DD Form 1966, Record of Military
Processing – Armed Forces of the United States, is blank. He is
not sure why his current address at the time of his initial
enlistment is used for his HOR. He was born in Beckley, WV, and
that is where his family lives.
In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides a copy of his
DD Form 1966.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of staff sergeant.
The applicant’s DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document
Armed Forces of the United States, reflects the HOR as Surfside,
SC.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states the applicant’s
records reflect Surfside, SC, as the HOR at which he lived prior
to entering the Air Force enlisted ranks. This address is also
listed on his DD Form 4 as the HOR, which per AFI 36-2608, Table
A2.1, Item 5, is the source document for HOR. Due to this
finding, the applicant’s HOR is Surfside, SC. The Joint Federal
Travel Regulations (JFTR) for Uniformed Service Members Appendix
A states that the HOR is the place recorded as the home of the
individual when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or
ordered into a tour of active duty. Any correction made to a
member’s HOR must be fully justified and the home, as corrected,
must be the member’s actual home upon entering the service, and
not a different place selected for the member’s convenience.
There is no error or justification that warrants a change in the
applicant’s record.
The DPSIPE complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 2 July 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit
C). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02477 in Executive Session on 23 January 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
2
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02477 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 May 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 22 June 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 July 2012.
3
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01906
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01906 COUNSEL: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to 2330 Buckboard Trail, Cottonwood, AZ 86326. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05855
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05855 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed from Hope, IN to Columbia, SC. According to the applicants DD Form 4/1,Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, Hope, IN was her home of record at the time of her enlistment. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05855
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05855 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed from Hope, IN to Columbia, SC. According to the applicants DD Form 4/1,Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, Hope, IN was her home of record at the time of her enlistment. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03524
The applicant's initial DD Form 4 reflects Mentor, Minnesota as the city/state in which he lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout his military records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02240
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02480 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Arizona (AZ) to XXXXXXX, Massachusetts (MA). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00367
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00367 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to El Paso TX. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the applicant's request to change her HOR from Philadelphia, PA to EL...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04018
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04018 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Dunkirk, Maryland (MD) to Eagle River, Alaska (AK). The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe that his home of record was erroneously...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01311
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01311 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to reflect New Orleans, LA. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01382
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01382 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Florida to Minnesota. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...